evidence_text: Rep. Posthumus requested a ruling of the Chair on how the majority vote is determined in this ruling.
  
  The Chair ruled that it is the decision of the Chair.
  
  Rep. Posthumus appealed the decision of the Chair.
  
  The question being, “Shall the judgment of the Chair stand as the judgment of the House?”
  
  The judgment of the Chair stood as the judgment of the House, a majority of the members present voting, by yeas and nays, as follows:
  
  Roll Call No. 90 Yeas—56
  
  Aiyash Edwards McFall Scott
  
  Andrews Farhat McKinney Shannon
  
  Arbit Fitzgerald Mentzer Skaggs
  
  Brabec Glanville Miller Snyder
  
  Breen Grant Morgan Steckloff
  
  Brixie Haadsma Morse Stone
  
  Byrnes Hill Neeley Tate
  
  Carter, B. Hood O’Neal Tsernoglou
  
  Carter, T. Hope Paiz Wegela
  
  Churches Hoskins Pohutsky Weiss
  
  Coffia Koleszar Price Whitsett
  
  Coleman Liberati Puri Wilson
  
  Conlin MacDonell Rheingans Witwer
  
  Dievendorf Martus Rogers Young
  
  Nays—52
  
  Alexander DeSana Lightner Schmaltz
  
  Aragona Filler Maddock Schriver
  
  Beeler Fink Markkanen Schuette
  
  BeGole Fox Martin Slagh
  
  Beson Friske Meerman Smit
  
  Bezotte Green, P. Mueller St. Germaine
  
  Bierlein Greene, J. Neyer Thompson
  
  Bollin Hall Outman Tisdel
  
  Borton Harris Paquette VanderWall
  
  Carra Hoadley Posthumus VanWoerkom
  
  Cavitt Johnsen Prestin Wendzel
  
  DeBoer Kuhn Rigas Wozniak
  
  DeBoyer Kunse Roth Zorn
  
  In The Chair: Pohutsky
  
  The question being on the adoption of the amendments offered previously by Rep. Hall,
  
  The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.