evidence_text: Rep. Robinson moved to amend the bill as follows:
  
  1. Amend page 21, following line 1, by inserting:
  
  “Sec. 2109. (1) All rates for automobile insurance and home insurance shall MUST be made in accordance with the following provisions:
  
  (a) Rates shall MUST not be excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory. A rate shall MUST not be held to be excessive unless the rate is unreasonably high for the insurance coverage provided. and a reasonable degree of competition does not exist for the insurance to which the rate is applicable.
  
  (b) A rate shall MUST not be held to be inadequate unless the rate is unreasonably low for the insurance coverage provided and the continued use of the rate endangers the solvency of the insurer; or unless the rate is unreasonably low for the insurance provided and the use of the rate has or will have the effect of destroying competition among insurers, creating a monopoly, or causing a kind of insurance to be unavailable to a significant number of applicants who are in good faith entitled to procure that insurance through ordinary methods.
  
  (c) A rate for a coverage is unfairly discriminatory in relation to another rate for the same coverage if the differential between the rates is not reasonably justified by differences in losses, expenses, or both, or by differences in the uncertainty of loss, for the individuals or risks to which the rates apply. A reasonable justification shall MUST be supported by a reasonable classification system; by sound actuarial principles when applicable; and by actual and credible loss and expense statistics or, in the case of FOR new coverages and classifications, by reasonably anticipated loss and expense experience. A rate is not unfairly discriminatory because it reflects differences in expenses for individuals or risks with similar anticipated losses, or because it reflects differences in losses for individuals or risks with similar expenses.
  
  (2) A determination concerning the existence of a reasonable egree of competition with respect to subsection (1)(a) shall take into account a reasonable spectrum of relevant economic tests, including the number of insurers actively engaged in writing the insurance in question, the present availability of such insurance compared to its availability in comparable past periods, the underwriting return of that insurance over a period of time sufficient to assure reliability in relation to the risk associated with that insurance, and the difficulty encountered by new insurers in entering the market in order to compete for the writing of that insurance. ”.
  
  The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.