evidence_text: Rep. Aiyash moved to amend the bill as follows :
  
  1. Amend page 2, line 9, after “ that ” by inserting a comma and “ after a public hearing on the proposed exemption, each local tax collecting unit in which the equipment is or will be located has determined that ”.
  
  2. Amend page 2, following line 13, by inserting:
  
  “ (3) A qualified business that obtains an exemption under this section shall send a written notice clearly describing the new service being offered to every discoverable address in the area in which the equipment subject to the exemption is intended to resolve lack of broadband service. ” and renumbering the remaining subsection.
  
  3. Amend page 2, line 24, after “ than ” by striking out the balance of the sentence and inserting “ 1 of the following, as applicable:
  
  (A) Five years, if the property is related to the provision of wireless service.
  
  (B) Twelve years, if the property is related to the provision of wired service. For property to qualify under this sub-subparagraph, the supported service must deliver high-speed internet access at speeds of at least 50 megabits per second downstream and 10 megabits per second upstream. ”.
  
  The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.