evidence_text: Rep. Martus moved to amend the bill as follows:
  
  1. Amend page 690, line 8, by striking out all of lines 8 through 27 and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.
  
  2. Amend page 732, line 9, by striking out the balance of the page through “28.611.” on line 21 of page 733.
  
  3. Amend page 847, following line 2, by inserting:
  
  Sec. 108. MICHIGAN COMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS
  
  Full-time equated classified positions
  
  27.0
  
  In-service training—FTEs
  
  7.0
  
  $
  
  13,271,100
  
  Justice training grants—FTEs
  
  3.0
  
  10,000,000
  
  Public safety officers benefit fund—FTE
  
  1.0
  
  303,000
  
  Standards and training—FTEs
  
  16.0
  
  4,060,800
  
  Training only to local units
  
  855,000
  
  GROSS APPROPRIATION
  
  $
  
  28,489,900
  
  Appropriated from:
  
  Federal revenues:
  
  DOJ
  
  280,200
  
  Special revenue funds:
  
  Law enforcement officers training fund
  
  25,300
  
  Marihuana regulatory fund
  
  3,390,100
  
  Michigan justice training fund
  
  10,000,000
  
  Private security licensing fees
  
  5,000
  
  Retired law enforcement officer safety fund
  
  25,000
  
  Secondary road patrol and training fund
  
  855,000
  
  State general fund/general purpose
  
  $
  
  13,909,300
  
  and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly.
  
  4. Amend page 887, following line 29, by inserting:
  
  “ MICHIGAN COMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARDS
  
  Sec. 801. (1) MCOLES shall establish standards for the selection, employment, training, education, licensing, and licensure revocation of all law enforcement officers and provide the basic law enforcement training curriculum for law enforcement training academy programs statewide.
  
  (2) MCOLES shall maintain staffing and resources necessary to update law enforcement standards within 120 days of the enactment date of any new public acts that affect MCOLES.
  
  (3) From the funds appropriated in part 1, MCOLES, by March 1, shall submit a report to the standard report recipients that includes a summary of MCOLES activities during the prior calendar year. The report required under this subsection must include, but is not limited to, both of the following:
  
  (a) An account of the distribution of training funds administered by MCOLES.
  
  (b) A list of recipients that received training funds under subdivision (a) and the amount received by each recipient and for what purpose it was used.
  
  Sec. 802. The general fund/general purpose funds appropriated in part 1 for public safety officers benefit fund must be deposited into the public safety officers benefit fund created in section 3 of the public safety officers benefit act, 2004 PA 46, MCL 28.633. The general fund/general purpose funds appropriated in part 1 for public safety officers benefit fund and deposited into the public safety officers benefit fund in accordance with section 3 of the public safety officers benefit act, 2004 PA 46, MCL 28.633, and this section must be used to increase the $25,000.00 benefit payment made to a recipient who dies or is permanently and totally disabled during the fiscal year under section 4 of the public safety officers benefit act, 2004 PA 46, MCL 28.634, to $50,000.00. All funds in the public safety officers benefit fund are appropriated and available for expenditure in accordance with section 3 of the public safety officers benefit act, 2004 PA 46, MCL 28.633.
  
  Sec. 803. Funds appropriated in part 1 for in-service training must be deposited into the law enforcement officers training fund created in section 11(7) of the Michigan commission on law enforcement standards act, 1965 PA 203, MCL 28.611. All funds in the law enforcement officers training fund are appropriated and available for expenditure to support the implementation of required annual in-service training standards for all licensed law enforcement officers, in accordance with rules promulgated under section 11(2) of the Michigan commission on law enforcement standards act, 1965 PA 203, MCL 28.611.”.
  
  The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.