evidence_text: Rep. Kuhn moved to amend the bill as follows :
  
  1. Amend page 6, line 28, by striking out “the preponderance of the” and inserting “clear and convincing”.
  
  2. Amend page 10, line 29, by striking out “restrained individual must prove by a preponderance of the” and inserting “court must enter an order terminating the extreme risk protection order unless the court finds by clear and convincing”.
  
  3. Amend page 11, line 1, after “individual” by striking out “no longer poses” and inserting “continues to pose”.
  
  4. Amend page 21, line 25, after “if” by striking out “the preponderance of the” and inserting “clear and convincing”.
  
  The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.