(c) House Bill No. 5194.
(d) House Bill No. 5195.”.
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
The question being on the adoption of the resolution,
Point of Order
Rep. Fitzgerald requested a ruling of the Chair on if impugning the motives of a member does not apply to only members of this Chamber, and I believe the members comments could be seen as impugning the motives of the elected Representatives of this state, and ask that that member be called to order.
The Chair ruled the Representative is in order and germane to the resolution.
The question being on the adoption of the resolution,
Rep. Posthumus demanded the yeas and nays.
The demand was supported.
The question being on the adoption of the resolution,
The resolution was adopted, a majority of the members present voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows: