any dwelling, but not of other properties, such as commercial or investment properties, owned by a judge.
While I appreciate the intent of the legislation, we must balance the need for transparency and sunshine of
our public officials. There is no need to exempt the addresses of properties owned by a judge that are not
used for residential purposes, but instead are commercial or investment properties in nature.
I ask for my colleagues’ support of this amendment.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 5077, entitled
A bill to amend 2019 PA 39, entitled “Administration of opioid antagonists act,” by amending the title and
sections 103 and 107 (MCL 15.673 and 15.677), section 107 as amended by 2020 PA 321, and by adding
section 106.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows: