Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 4 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- following statement:
“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:
There is legislation coming from the Senate also. Both bill packages provide an opportunity to keep
working on this issue, so workers and employers are supported.”
Rep. Posthumus moved that House Bill No. 4002 be placed on its immediate passage.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
House Bill No. 4002, entitled
A bill to amend 2018 PA 338, entitled “Earned sick time act,” by amending sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10,
11, and 12 (MCL 408.962, 408.963, 408.964, 408.965, 408.966, 408.967, 408.968, 408.970, 408.971,
and 408.972).
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays
as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Motion text
- as follows:
- Nays
- 38
- Not voting
- 5
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2025-01-23
- Vote number
- 5
- Yeas
- 67
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- House Bill No. 4002
The motion prevailed.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 4002, entitled
A bill to amend 2018 PA 338, entitled “Earned sick time act,” by amending the title and sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 (MCL 408.962, 408.963, 408.964, 408.965, 408.966, 408.967, 408.968, and 408.972) and by adding section 3a.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Nesbitt offered the following amendment:
1. Amend page 3, line 18, after “employs” by striking out “1” and inserting “ 50 ”.
The question being on the adoption of the amendment,
Senator Theis requested the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 18
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- failed
- Vote date
- 2025-02-20
- Vote number
- 9
- Yeas
- 18
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Nays—18
Anthony Cherry McCann Santana
Bayer Geiss McMorrow Shink
Brinks Hertel Moss Singh
Cavanagh Irwin Polehanki Wojno
Chang Klinefelt
Excused—1
Camilleri
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: Moss
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 10
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2025-02-20
- Vote number
- 10
- Yeas
- 26
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-3) made to the bill by the Senate,
Rep. Myers-Phillips moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3) as follows:
1. Amend page 3, line 6, by striking out all of subparagraph ( ii ) and renumbering the remaining subparagraphs.
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.
Rep. Myers-Phillips moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3) as follows:
1. Amend page 17, line 27, after “may” by striking out the balance of the subsection and inserting “do any of the following:
(a) Bring a civil action for appropriate relief, including, but not limited to, payment for used earned sick time; rehiring or reinstatement to the employee’s previous job; payment of back wages; reestablishment of employee benefits to which the employee otherwise would have been eligible if the employee had not been subjected to retaliatory personnel action or discrimination; the violation; and an equal additional amount as liquidated damages together with costs and reasonable attorney fees as the court allows.
(b) File a claim with the department, which shall investigate the claim. Filing a claim with the department is neither a prerequisite nor a bar to bringing a civil action.”.
The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.
The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-3) made to the bill by the Senate,
The substitute (S-3) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Motion text
- The substitute (S-3) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 29
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2025-02-20
- Vote number
- 12
- Yeas
- 81