Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 2 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of
Notices
Pursuant to Rule 40, the Speaker has made the following referrals:
House Bill No. 4499 referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
House Bill No. 4500 referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of
Third Reading of Bills
House Bill No. 4100, entitled
A bill to amend 2001 PA 142, entitled “Michigan memorial highway act,” (MCL 250.1001 to 250.2092) by
adding section 6d.
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays
as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- as follows:
- Nays
- 1
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2025-05-20
- Vote number
- 118
- Yeas
- 106
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Over the last couple of terms we’ve had a number of opportunities to deal with bills such as this one which
seek to change the Open Meetings Act requirements for a certain board or commission. I have introduced
legislation that would overhaul the Open Meetings Act and modernize it in such a way so we would stop
doing these one-off piecemeal attempts at fixing the situation until we have to wrestle with a whole problem
rather than just taking these little bites because everybody’s going to want something and we’re not doing it
in a uniform way. That’s why I’m voting “no.”
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 4100, entitled
A bill to amend 2001 PA 142, entitled “Michigan memorial highway act,” (MCL 250.1001 to 250.2092)
by adding section 6d.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 2
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2026-07-03
- Vote number
- 190
- Yeas
- 36