Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 3 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
-
Rep. Myers-Phillips, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:
“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:
Unfortunately, the national guard is being politicized and mobilized for police actions against U.S citizens and civilians across the nation in ways that courts have deemed to be illegal. I am unable to support this legislation at this time. However, it’s important to note that the Michigan National Guard already offers competitive benefits. Instead, I am motivated to pass legislation that provides a framework to increase access to tuition assistance and childcare assistance for low- to moderate-income Michiganders across the State.”
Rep. Young, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:
“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:
As the Chair of the Detroit Caucus, I would be remiss not to consider the current political posture around sending the National Guard into my city, uninvited. The last time the National Guard was deployed to Detroit was disastrous. This is poor timing for this legislation, particularly because Michigan’s current National Guard force is comparable to other states with similar populations.”
Rep. Posthumus moved that House Bill No. 5055 be placed on its immediate passage.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
House Bill No. 5055, entitled
A bill to amend 2001 PA 185, entitled “Legislative sergeant at arms police powers act,” by amending section 2 (MCL 4.382), as amended by 2016 PA 303.
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
- Nays
- 48
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2025-10-01
- Vote number
- 239
- Yeas
- 61
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- The motion prevailed, the time being 12:31 p.m.
1:15 p.m.
The Senate was called to order by the Assistant President pro tempore, Senator Cherry.
During the recess, Senator Daley entered the Senate Chamber.
Senator Singh moved that the Senate proceed to consideration of the following bill:
House Bill No. 5055
The motion prevailed.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 5055, entitled
A bill to amend 2001 PA 185, entitled “Legislative sergeant at arms police powers act,” by amending section 2 (MCL 4.382), as amended by 2016 PA 303.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 16
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2025-11-13
- Vote number
- 303
- Yeas
- 20
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- Foreman
Nays—0
In The Chair: Smit
House Bill No. 5055, entitled
A bill to amend 2001 PA 185, entitled “Legislative sergeant at arms police powers act,” by amending section 2 (MCL 4.382), as amended by 2016 PA 303.
The Senate has substituted (S-1) the bill.
The Senate has passed the bill as substituted (S-1) and pursuant to Joint Rule 20, inserted the full title.
The Speaker announced that pursuant to Rule 41, the bill was laid over one day.
Rep. Posthumus moved that Rule 41 be suspended.
The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The question being on concurring in the (S-1) made to the bill by the Senate,
The substitute (S-1) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- The substitute (S-1) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 0
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2025-11-13
- Vote number
- 317
- Yeas
- 101