Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 1 related record on this page. A total was not computed.

1. Related record

   Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:

   Open script-free record →

   Inspect published fields

   Chamber

   house

   Context text

   Rep. Paiz, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: Opposed to the approx. $8 million in state revenue that would be lost. Would eliminate the funding source for the teacher certification database and eliminate the database.” Rep. Glanville, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: This bill is an example of bending over a dollar to pick up a dime. The true cost of certification is not in the $100 fee that is incurred every 5 years. Rather, it’s in the out of pocket cost to teachers in achieving recertification. Additionally, this bill results in an $8M shortfall in the MDE budget that directly impacts the Office of Educator Excellence and the administration of MOECS (the system designed to track teacher certification). I can not vote in favor of a bill that does not maintain the excellence we strive for in teacher preparation.” Rep. Weiss, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: While HB 4150 is well intentioned to lower costs for licensure renewal for teachers, the lack of a plan to backfill the department will have unintended consequences that could actually make it more difficult for teachers to renew their certification. I believe that a better approach for this issue would be to provide an appropriation in the budget to cover that lost revenue. If that were approach were taken, I would support this proposal.” House Bill No. 4151, entitled A bill to amend 1976 PA 451, entitled “The revised school code,” by amending section 1531 (MCL 380.1531), as amended by 2023 PA 110. Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:

   Excused

   Not recorded

   Measure id

   measure-151

   Motion text

   Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:

   Nays

   13

   Not voting

   Not recorded

   Result

   passed

   Sitting id

   sitting-27

   Vote date

   2025-03-12

   Vote id

   vote-1334

   Vote number

   23

   Yeas

   96