Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 3 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- The motion prevailed.
Senator Webber’s statement is as follows:
Over the past several weeks, the majority in this chamber has spent countless hours in committee and on the floor debating issues that, quite frankly, we as state legislators have no control over; but today, we have a real opportunity to do something meaningful, something we do have control over. The only reason these bills are before us today is because I called for immediate action in committee. These bipartisan bills would expand Medicaid coverage to group prenatal care for expecting mothers, support that would make a real difference for families in communities across our state. I’m glad we’re finally taking them up and I’m proud to support these bills. I urge my colleagues to join me in voting “yes.”
Senator Hauck’s statement is as follows:
I rise in support of these bills, but also to share my disappointment. These bipartisan bills are a concrete way that we can help low-income Michiganders receive prenatal services, but they should have become law a long time ago. After being passed by the chamber last year, they were the victim of the House Democrats’ dysfunction at the end of 2024. Now, we’re halfway through 2025 and they’re just now receiving another vote in the Senate. Why? Because for weeks Democrats used the Health Policy Committee to hold press conference disguised as committee hearings to bash Donald Trump. It wasn’t dissimilar to the entire session day Democrats spent last week giving floor speeches about the President instead of finalizing a budget for schools.
Mr. President, we cannot control what happens in Washington, D.C., but these bills are an example of what we can do for the people of Michigan. Democrats just need to take a break from their Trump derangement syndrome to realize it—
I ask for a “yes” vote.
The following bill was read a third time:
Senate Bill No. 415, entitled
A bill to amend 1939 PA 280, entitled “The social welfare act,” (MCL 400.1 to 400.119b) by adding section 109t.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2025-07-01
- Vote number
- 202
- Yeas
- 36
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- Fitzgerald Martus Schriver Xiong
Foreman McFall Schuette Young
Fox McKinney
Nays—4
Carra Hoadley Maddock Meerman
In The Chair: Smit
The House agreed to the title of the bill.
Rep. Posthumus moved that the bill be given immediate effect.
The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.
Senate Bill No. 415, entitled
A bill to amend 1939 PA 280, entitled “The social welfare act,” (MCL 400.1 to 400.119b) by adding section 109t.
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
- Nays
- 3
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2026-06-25
- Vote number
- 273
- Yeas
- 103
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- The bill was referred to the Secretary for enrollment printing and presentation to the Governor.
Senate Bill No. 415, entitled
A bill to amend 1939 PA 280, entitled “The social welfare act,” (MCL 400.1 to 400.119b) by adding
section 109t.
The House of Representatives has substituted (H-1) the bill.
The House of Representatives has passed the bill as substituted (H-1), ordered that it be given immediate
effect and pursuant to Joint Rule 20, inserted the full title.
Pending the order that, under rule 3.202, the bill be laid over one day,
Senator Singh moved that the rule be suspended.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
The question being on concurring in the substitute made to the bill by the House,
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 2
- Motion text
- The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2026-07-03
- Vote number
- 217
- Yeas
- 36