Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 2 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- Farhat Maddock Rogers Wozniak
Fitzgerald Markkanen Roth Xiong
Foreman Martin Schmaltz
Nays—4
Bruck Carra Fox Wegela
In The Chair: Smit
The House agreed to the title of the bill.
Rep. Posthumus moved that the bill be given immediate effect.
The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.
House Bill No. 4045, entitled
A bill to enact the uniform public expression protection act; and to provide protections and remedies to persons sued for exercising rights to expression and other constitutionally protected rights.
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
- Nays
- 0
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2025-10-22
- Vote number
- 262
- Yeas
- 103
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- “An act to require certain meetings of certain public bodies to be open to the public; to require notice and the keeping of minutes of meetings; to provide for enforcement; to provide for invalidation of governmental decisions under certain circumstances; to provide penalties; and to repeal certain acts and parts of acts,”
The Senate agreed to the full title.
Senator Singh moved that the Senate proceed to consideration of the following bills:
House Bill No. 4045
House Bill No. 4262
House Bill No. 4666
The motion prevailed.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 4045, entitled
A bill to enact the uniform public expression protection act; and to provide protections and remedies to persons sued for exercising rights to expression and other constitutionally protected rights.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2025-12-18
- Vote number
- 347
- Yeas
- 36