Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 8 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- voting therefor.
Rep. Witwer moved that the bill be placed on the order of Third Reading of Bills.
The motion prevailed.
Rep. Aiyash moved that the bill be placed on its immediate passage.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of
Third Reading of Bills
House Bill No. 4001, entitled
A bill to amend 1967 PA 281, entitled “Income tax act of 1967,” by amending sections 30 and 51 (MCL
206.30 and 206.51), section 30 as amended by 2022 PA 5 and section 51 as amended by 2020 PA 75.
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays,
as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- as follows:
- Nays
- 41
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2023-01-26
- Vote number
- 5
- Yeas
- 67
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- Rep. Schmaltz moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-2) as follows:
1. Amend page 1, line 8, after “(b)” by striking out “Except as otherwise provided under subdivision (c),
on” and inserting “On”.
2. Amend page 1, line 9, after “2012” by inserting “and before January 1, 2023”.
3. Amend page 1, following line 9, by inserting:
“(c) Except as otherwise provided under subdivision (d), on and after January 1, 2023, 4.05%.”
and relettering the remaining subdivision.
The motion did not prevail and the amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not
voting therefor.
The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-2) made to the bill by the Senate,
The substitute (S-2) was not concurred in, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas
and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 56
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2023-02-01
- Vote number
- 12
- Yeas
- 53
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Government Relations Section
Transparency and Accountability Division
The communication was referred to the Secretary for record.
Senator Singh moved that the rules be suspended and that the following bill, now on Third Reading of Bills, be placed on its immediate passage:
House Bill No. 4001
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
Third Reading of Bills
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 4001, entitled
A bill to amend 1967 PA 281, entitled “Income tax act of 1967,” by amending section 51 (MCL 206.51), as amended by 2020 PA 75.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 18
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2023-02-01
- Vote number
- 16
- Yeas
- 20
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- House Bill No. 4001, entitled
A bill to amend 1967 PA 281, entitled “Income tax act of 1967,” by amending sections 30 and 51 (MCL 206.30 and 206.51), section 30 as amended by 2022 PA 5 and section 51 as amended by 2020 PA 75.
(The conference report was reported by the conference committee on February 8.)
(For conference report, see House Journal No. 13, p. 153.)
The question being on the adoption of the conference report,
After debate,
Rep. Aiyash demanded the previous question.
The demand was supported.
The question being, “Shall the main question now be put?”
The previous question was ordered.
The question being on the adoption of the conference report,
The conference report was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- The conference report was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 53
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- adopted
- Vote date
- 2023-02-09
- Vote number
- 13
- Yeas
- 56
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- The question being on the motion to suspend the joint rule,
Point of Order
Senator Lauwers raised the Point of Order that the conference report is a violation of article IV, section 24 of the Michigan Constitution. The Constitution mandates that, “No law shall embrace more than one object. … No bill shall be altered or amended on its passage through either house so as to change its original purpose as determined by its total content and not alone by its title.”
The President, Lieutenant Governor Gilchrist, ruled that the conference report on House Bill No. 4001 does not violate this constitutional provision because it contains sections of the bill as introduced.
Point of Order
Senator Lauwers raised the Point of Order that this conference report violates Joint Rule 8—“The conference committee shall not consider any matters other than the matters of difference between the two houses.” Today the conference report we are being asked to vote on adds several sections that were never before considered in either the House- or Senate-passed versions of House Bill No. 4001, and is therefore in violation of Joint Rule 8.
The President, Lieutenant Governor Gilchrist, ruled that the conference report is not in violation of the joint rule. There are no Senate amendments pending and what is before the Senate is the conference report itself. The conference report can include amendments to effect its agreement according to Joint Rule 8: “When the conferees arrive at an agreement on the matters of difference that affects other parts of the bill or resolution, the conferees may recommend amendments to conform with the agreement.”
Senator Lauwers appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question being shall the decision of the Chair stand as the judgment of the Senate,
Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The decision of the Chair stood as the judgment of the Senate, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The decision of the Chair stood as the judgment of the Senate, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 17
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2023-02-16
- Vote number
- 21
- Yeas
- 20
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Bellino Hoitenga Lindsey Theis
Bumstead Huizenga Nesbitt Victory
Daley Johnson Outman Webber
Damoose
Excused—1
McBroom
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: President
The question being on the motion to suspend Joint Rule 9,
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
The question being on the adoption of the conference report,
The first conference report was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The first conference report was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 17
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- adopted
- Vote date
- 2023-02-16
- Vote number
- 22
- Yeas
- 20
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Bellino Hoitenga Lindsey Theis
Bumstead Huizenga Nesbitt Victory
Daley Johnson Outman Webber
Damoose
Excused—1
McBroom
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: President
Senator Singh moved that the bill be given immediate effect.
On which motion Senator Singh requested the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The motion did not prevail, 2/3 of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The motion did not prevail, 2/3 of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 17
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2023-02-16
- Vote number
- 23
- Yeas
- 20
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- 1.104 ELECTION OF SENATE OFFICERS
a) At the first session of a quadrennium, a President pro tempore, and Assistant President pro tempore , and Associate President pro tempore shall be elected by a vote of a majority of the Senators elected and serving. All officers elected by the Senate hold office until their successors are elected and qualified or until the expiration of their Senate term, whichever occurs first.
b) Prior to the commencement of the quadrennium session, the majority party shall meet in an organizational caucus and elect a Majority Leader, Majority Floor Leader, Majority Whip, Majority Caucus Chairperson, Assistant Majority Leaders, Assistant Majority Floor Leaders, Assistant Majority Whip, and Assistant Majority Caucus Chairperson. At a similar organizational caucus, the minority party shall elect a Minority Leader, Minority Floor Leader, Minority Whip, Minority Caucus Chairperson, Assistant Minority Leader, Assistant Minority Floor Leader, Assistant Minority Whip, and Assistant Minority Caucus Chairperson.
c) All majority party Senate officers shall serve at the pleasure of the majority party caucus. All minority party Senate officers shall serve at the pleasure of the minority party caucus.
d) All majority and minority party caucuses shall be subject to Section 8 of the Open Meetings Act (see MCL 15.268).
Pending the order that, under rule 3.204, the resolution be referred to the Committee on Government Operations,
Senator Singh moved that the rule be suspended.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
The question being on the adoption of the resolution,
Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 17
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- adopted
- Vote date
- 2023-02-16
- Vote number
- 24
- Yeas
- 20