Michigan Legislative Activity Ledger

Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 4 related records on this page. A total was not computed.

  1. Related record

    Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    Beeler Fox Paquette St. Germaine BeGole Friske Posthumus Thompson Beson Greene, J. Prestin VanderWall Carra Hoadley Rigas Wendzel Cavitt Maddock Roth In The Chair: Pohutsky The House agreed to the title of the bill. Rep. Aiyash moved that the bill be given immediate effect. The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor. House Bill No. 4354, entitled A bill to amend 1947 PA 336, entitled “An act to prohibit strikes by certain public employees; to provide review from disciplinary action with respect thereto; to provide for the mediation of grievances and the holding of elections; to declare and protect the rights and privileges of public employees; to require certain provisions in collective bargaining agreements; to prescribe means of enforcement and penalties for the violation of the provisions of this act; and to make appropriations,” by amending section 15 (MCL 423.215), as amended by 2014 PA 414. Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-3699
    Motion text
    Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Nays
    53
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    passed
    Sitting id
    sitting-416
    Vote date
    2023-06-20
    Vote id
    vote-2860
    Vote number
    177
    Yeas
    56
  2. Related record

    The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    senate
    Context text
    The Senate agreed to the title of the bill. The following bill was read a third time: House Bill No. 4354, entitled A bill to amend 1947 PA 336, entitled “An act to prohibit strikes by certain public employees; to provide review from disciplinary action with respect thereto; to provide for the mediation of grievances and the holding of elections; to declare and protect the rights and privileges of public employees; to require certain provisions in collective bargaining agreements; to prescribe means of enforcement and penalties for the violation of the provisions of this act; and to make appropriations,” by amending section 15 (MCL 423.215), as amended by 2023 PA 9. The question being on the passage of the bill, Senator Albert offered the following amendment: 1. Amend page 5, following line 24, by inserting: “ (j) (p) Decisions about the development, format, content, and procedures of the notification to parents and legal guardians required under section 1249a of the revised school code, 1976 PA 451, MCL 380.1249a.”. The question being on the adoption of the amendment, Senator Theis requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
    Excused
    1
    Measure id
    measure-3699
    Motion text
    The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
    Nays
    20
    Not voting
    0
    Result
    failed
    Sitting id
    sitting-609
    Vote date
    2023-06-28
    Vote id
    vote-7217
    Vote number
    439
    Yeas
    17
  3. Related record

    The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    senate
    Context text
    In The Chair: President Senator Daley offered the following amendment: 1. Amend page 7, following line 6, by inserting: “(9) The following are prohibited subjects of bargaining and are at the sole discretion of the public employer: (a) A decision as to whether or not the public employer will enter into an intergovernmental agreement to consolidate 1 or more functions or services, to jointly perform 1 or more functions or services, or to otherwise collaborate regarding 1 or more functions or services. (b) The procedures for obtaining a contract for the transfer of functions or responsibilities under an agreement described in subdivision (a). (c) The identities of any other parties to an agreement described in subdivision (a). (10) Subsection (9) does not relieve a public employer of any duty established by law to collectively bargain with its employees as to the effect of a contract described in subsection (9)(a) on its employees.” and renumbering the remaining subsection. The question being on the adoption of the amendment, Senator Theis requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
    Excused
    1
    Measure id
    measure-3699
    Motion text
    The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
    Nays
    20
    Not voting
    0
    Result
    failed
    Sitting id
    sitting-609
    Vote date
    2023-06-28
    Vote id
    vote-7218
    Vote number
    440
    Yeas
    17
  4. Related record

    The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    senate
    Context text
    Nays—20 Anthony Chang Klinefelt Polehanki Bayer Cherry McCann Santana Brinks Geiss McDonald Rivet Shink Camilleri Hertel McMorrow Singh Cavanagh Irwin Moss Wojno Excused—1 Lauwers Not Voting—0 In The Chair: President The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Excused
    1
    Measure id
    measure-3699
    Motion text
    The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Nays
    17
    Not voting
    0
    Result
    passed
    Sitting id
    sitting-609
    Vote date
    2023-06-28
    Vote id
    vote-7219
    Vote number
    441
    Yeas
    20