Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 2 related records on this page. A total was not computed.

Related record
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
Chamber
house
Context text
Friske Hoadley In The Chair: Pohutsky The House agreed to the title of the bill. Rep. Aiyash moved that the bill be given immediate effect. The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor. Rep. Jamie Greene, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: Victims’ privacy must be protected. This bill does not provide that protection. While I understand what it is trying to be accomplished, the victims should not be contacted after the fact that an organization has their information, they should be the ones giving the permission first. This Bill is not written that way.” House Bill No. 4421, entitled A bill to amend 1985 PA 87, entitled “William Van Regenmorter crime victim’s rights act,” by amending sections 8, 38, and 68 (MCL 780.758, 780.788, and 780.818), as amended by 2012 PA 457. Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
Excused
Not recorded
Measure id
measure-3766
Motion text
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
Nays
1
Not voting
Not recorded
Result
passed
Sitting id
sitting-411
Vote date
2023-06-07
Vote id
vote-2821
Vote number
138
Yeas
105
Related record
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
Chamber
senate
Context text
Senator Theis, under her constitutional right of protest (Art. 4, Sec. 18), protested against the passage of House Bill No. 4420. Senator Theis’ statement is as follows: I am beyond offended that this body believes that a woman who has been sexually assaulted—that her information should be released without her permission. That amendment simply asked that the police ask for her permission before they release it. So many members of this body voted against getting a woman’s permission before her most-personal information is released to strangers. Shame on you. Senator Theis asked and was granted unanimous consent to make a statement and moved that the statement be printed in the Journal. The motion prevailed. Senator Theis’ statement is as follows: All my amendment does is require the permission of the victim before her personal information is released. The following bill was read a third time: House Bill No. 4421, entitled A bill to amend 1985 PA 87, entitled “William Van Regenmorter crime victim’s rights act,” by amending sections 8, 38, and 68 (MCL 780.758, 780.788, and 780.818), as amended by 2012 PA 457. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Excused
0
Measure id
measure-3766
Motion text
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Nays
0
Not voting
0
Result
passed
Sitting id
sitting-637
Vote date
2023-10-19
Vote id
vote-7329
Vote number
551
Yeas
38

Related roll calls

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows: