Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 2 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- Rep. Fitzgerald moved that the bill be placed on the order of Third Reading of Bills.
The motion prevailed.
By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of
Third Reading of Bills
House Bill No. 4864, entitled
A bill to amend 1988 PA 418, entitled “Uniform statutory rule against perpetuities,” by amending sections 3 and 5 (MCL 554.73 and 554.75), section 5 as amended by 2011 PA 11.
The bill was read a third time.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Rep. Haadsma moved to substitute (H-1) the bill.
The motion was seconded and the substitute (H-1) was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was then not passed, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- The bill was then not passed, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 49
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- failed
- Vote date
- 2024-02-06
- Vote number
- 3
- Yeas
- 54
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- The House agreed to the full title.
Rep. Aiyash moved that the bill be given immediate effect.
The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.
House Bill No. 4864, entitled
A bill to amend 1988 PA 418, entitled “Uniform statutory rule against perpetuities,” by amending sections 3 and 5 (MCL 554.73 and 554.75), section 5 as amended by 2011 PA 11.
(The bill was read a third time and not passed, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, on February 6, see House Journal No. 11, p. 58.)
Rep. Aiyash moved that Rule 63 be suspended.
The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor.
Rep. Aiyash moved to reconsider the vote by which the House did not pass the bill.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 0
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2024-11-14
- Vote number
- 355
- Yeas
- 102