Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 3 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- The House agreed to the title of the bill.
Rep. Aiyash moved that the bill be given immediate effect.
The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.
Rep. Aiyash moved that House Bill No. 5594 be placed on its immediate passage.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
House Bill No. 5594, entitled
A bill to amend 1978 PA 90, entitled “Youth employment standards act,” by amending sections 2, 4, 5, 7,
8, and 20 (MCL 409.102, 409.104, 409.105, 409.107, 409.108, and 409.120), section 2 as amended by
1996 PA 438, section 4 as amended by 2011 PA 80, and section 5 as amended by 2020 PA 323, and by
adding sections 4a, 4b, 4c, and 4d.
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays,
as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- as follows:
- Nays
- 0
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2024-12-13
- Vote number
- 520
- Yeas
- 56
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Huizenga offered the following amendment:
1. Amend page 7, following line 7, by inserting:
“(4) The department shall establish and implement digital data security protection standards for
registry data involving minors that prevents the leaking of personal data of any Michigan citizen in
the registry. The security data standards must be equal to or greater than those used for Amazon.com
customer data. The department must yearly review and update these data security standards in order
to protect the sensitive data of minors and their work locations.”.
The question being on the adoption of the amendment,
Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Motion text
- The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 20
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- failed
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 695
- Yeas
- 18
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Anthony Chang Klinefelt Polehanki
Bayer Cherry McCann Santana
Brinks Geiss McDonald Rivet Shink
Camilleri Hertel McMorrow Singh
Cavanagh Irwin Moss Wojno
Excused—0
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: Geiss
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Singh moved that the previous question be ordered.
The motion prevailed.
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 18
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 696
- Yeas
- 20