Michigan Legislative Activity Ledger

Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 2 related records on this page. A total was not computed.

  1. Related record

    The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    senate
    Context text
    Mr. President, the bill as written before us only applies to the tax exemption for the purchasing of safety devices for a single year. My substitute would apply this exemption permanently and fully remove any state-imposed financial barriers to purchase the safety devices in question. This impactful change is aimed at incentivizing the purchase and usage of these devices while also supporting the Michigan taxpayers by keeping more money in their pockets, and not the exceedingly-full coffers of this state. I ask for a “yes” vote on my substitute to make these exemptions permanent. Senator Irwin’s statement is as follows: Very often in the Legislature we sunset provisions so that the Legislature can come back and take another look at them. I think it’s important, and I’m urging colleagues to vote “no” on this substitute — that we come back in this Legislature and consider whether this is an exemption that needs to continue, consider how successful it’s been, and I would also hate to rob a future group of legislators of the opportunity to extend this and for someone else to get a bill passed. For those reasons, I encourage everyone to vote “no.” The following bill was read a third time: Senate Bill No. 82, entitled A bill to amend 1937 PA 94, entitled “Use tax act,” (MCL 205.91 to 205.111) by adding section 4 ll . The question being on the passage of the bill, Senator Huizenga offered the following substitute: Substitute (S-3). The substitute was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Excused
    1
    Measure id
    measure-5722
    Motion text
    The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Nays
    15
    Not voting
    0
    Result
    passed
    Sitting id
    sitting-574
    Vote date
    2023-03-16
    Vote id
    vote-6866
    Vote number
    88
    Yeas
    22
  2. Related record

    as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: I will always advocate for responsible gun ownership, but this broad mandate doesn’t solve the root issues of violence or deter criminals from breaking laws that we already have. We already have plenty of laws on the books that can be used to punish people who act recklessly with a firearm to endanger children. These bills simply micromanage law-abiding citizens who wish to protect themselves with a firearm.” Rep. Aiyash moved that Senate Bill No. 82 be placed on its immediate passage. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. Senate Bill No. 82, entitled A bill to amend 1937 PA 94, entitled “Use tax act,” (MCL 205.91 to 205.111) by adding section 4ll. Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-5722
    Motion text
    as follows:
    Nays
    44
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    unknown
    Sitting id
    sitting-387
    Vote date
    2023-03-22
    Vote id
    vote-2732
    Vote number
    49
    Yeas
    64