Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 3 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.
Senator Chang offered the following amendments:
1. Amend page 11, line 9, by striking out “issued” and inserting “served or the restrained individual receives actual notice of the order”.
2. Amend page 16, line 14, by striking out “immediately”.
3. Amend page 17, line 10, after “expires” by inserting “or is terminated”.
The amendments were adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
Senator McMorrow offered the following amendment:
1. Amend page 10, following line 3, by inserting:
“(h) If the court has ordered the restrained individual to surrender the individual’s firearms and ammunition immediately, a statement that the law enforcement agency designated under subdivision (g) shall proceed to seize the restrained individual’s firearms and ammunition not later than 24 hours after the restrained individual is served with or receives actual notice of the extreme risk protection order, after first giving the restrained individual an opportunity to surrender the firearms and ammunition.” and relettering the remaining subdivisions.
The amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 17
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2023-03-16
- Vote number
- 90
- Yeas
- 20
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- DeBoer Kuhn Rigas Wozniak
DeBoyer Kunse Roth Zorn
DeSana Lightner Schmaltz
In The Chair: Pohutsky
The House agreed to the title of the bill.
Rep. Aiyash moved that the bill be given immediate effect.
The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.
Rep. Aiyash moved that Senate Bill No. 83 be placed on its immediate passage.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
Senate Bill No. 83, entitled
A bill to provide for the issuance of restraining orders prohibiting certain individuals from possessing or purchasing firearms and ordering the surrender and seizure of a restrained individual’s firearms; to provide for the powers and duties of certain state and local governmental officers and entities; to prescribe penalties; and to provide remedies.
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 51
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2023-04-13
- Vote number
- 55
- Yeas
- 56
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
By unanimous consent the Senate returned to the order of
Messages from the House
Senate Bill No. 83, entitled
A bill to provide for the issuance of restraining orders prohibiting certain individuals from possessing or purchasing firearms and ordering the surrender and seizure of a restrained individual’s firearms; to provide for the powers and duties of certain state and local governmental officers and entities; to prescribe penalties; and to provide remedies.
The House of Representatives has substituted (H-5) the bill.
The House of Representatives has passed the bill as substituted (H-5) and ordered that it be given immediate effect.
Pending the order that, under rule 3.202, the bill be laid over one day,
Senator Singh moved that the rule be suspended.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
The question being on concurring in the substitute made to the bill by the House,
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 17
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2023-04-19
- Vote number
- 118
- Yeas
- 20