Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 3 related records on this page. A total was not computed.

Related record
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
Chamber
senate
Context text
The Senate agreed to the title of the bill. Protest Senator McBroom, under his constitutional right of protest (Art. 4, Sec. 18), protested against the passage of Senate Bill No. 43. Senator McBroom’s statement is as follows: Madam President, Senate Bill No. 43 while a bill with good intention I think is certainly unnecessary and potentially creates additional costs and burdens on the state of Michigan. The Department of Transportation can already place these barriers, initiate policy, and utilize its discretion as much as it needs to determine what safety needs there are. There is not a need for us to pass this bill and mandate these be placed everywhere on some rigid circumstance rather than allowing the department to continue to do this. In the committee process, when asked about this the department had no explanation to give us as to why they need this to be put in a statute versus what they’re already doing. There was instead some vague thing about creating a standardized process but they’re the only Department of Transportation we have so who are we trying to standardize with? When I brought these issues up, I was accused by the department of not caring about the lives of highway construction workers, which is simply untrue. The department seemed to say, and they did say, that I’m putting a price on saving peoples’ lives which is incredibly insulting but is also assuming, somehow or other, that the department doesn’t place a price and a cost on its own workers’ lives, which it obviously does because if it spared no expense to protect highway workers’ lives, it would close down every single road it ever works on. It would simply tell the public, Well, good luck finding your own route to this place because for now in the name of safety and saving lives, this road is closed. But they don’t do that. They keep roads open. They pave extra lanes temporarily. They move traffic temporarily because they themselves recognize what everybody recognizes in the whole wide world, that you can’t do everything to do something. There’s limits on time, there’s limits on cost, there’s limits on materials. It was very insulting for the department to imply that I or anyone else who just voted “no” on Senate Bill No. 43 does not care about the lives of highway workers. That allegation could be thrown right back on them for their failure to do everything they could possibly do. That’s why I voted “no” and why I encourage this bill not to proceed beyond this point today. The following bill was read a third time: Senate Bill No. 129, entitled A bill to amend 1996 PA 381, entitled “Brownfield redevelopment financing act,” by amending the title and sections 2, 8, 8a, 13, 13b, 13c, 14, 14a, 15, and 16 (MCL 125.2652, 125.2658, 125.2658a, 125.2663, 125.2663b, 125.2663c, 125.2664, 125.2664a, 125.2665, and 125.2666), the title as amended by 2003 PA 259, section 2 as amended by 2022 PA 178, sections 8, 13, 13b, 15, and 16 as amended by 2020 PA 259, section 8a as amended by 2017 PA 46, sections 13c and 14a as amended by 2021 PA 138, and section 14 as amended by 2016 PA 471. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Excused
0
Measure id
measure-5769
Motion text
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Nays
13
Not voting
0
Result
passed
Sitting id
sitting-577
Vote date
2023-03-23
Vote id
vote-6887
Vote number
109
Yeas
25
Related record
The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
Chamber
house
Context text
Senate Bill No. 129, entitled A bill to amend 1996 PA 381, entitled “Brownfield redevelopment financing act,” by amending the title and sections 2, 8, 8a, 13, 13b, 13c, 14, 14a, 15, and 16 (MCL 125.2652, 125.2658, 125.2658a, 125.2663, 125.2663b, 125.2663c, 125.2664, 125.2664a, 125.2665, and 125.2666), the title as amended by 2003 PA 259, section 2 as amended by 2022 PA 178, sections 8, 13, 13b, 15, and 16 as amended by 2020 PA 259, section 8a as amended by 2017 PA 46, sections 13c and 14a as amended by 2021 PA 138, and section 14 as amended by 2016 PA 471. The bill was read a third time. The question being on the passage of the bill, Rep. Hoskins moved to substitute (H-5) the bill. The motion was seconded and the substitute (H-5) was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on the passage of the bill, Rep. Tisdel moved to amend the bill as follows: 1. Amend page 13, line 5, by striking out all of subparagraph (vi)and renumbering the remaining subparagraph. The motion was seconded and the amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
Excused
Not recorded
Measure id
measure-5769
Motion text
The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
Nays
38
Not voting
Not recorded
Result
passed
Sitting id
sitting-417
Vote date
2023-06-21
Vote id
vote-2885
Vote number
202
Yeas
71
Related record
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
Chamber
senate
Context text
The Senate agreed to the full title. The bill was referred to the Secretary for enrollment, printing and presentation to the Governor. Senate Bill No. 129, entitled A bill to amend 1996 PA 381, entitled “Brownfield redevelopment financing act,” by amending the title and sections 2, 8, 8a, 13, 13b, 13c, 14, 14a, 15, and 16 (MCL 125.2652, 125.2658, 125.2658a, 125.2663, 125.2663b, 125.2663c, 125.2664, 125.2664a, 125.2665, and 125.2666), the title as amended by 2003 PA 259, section 2 as amended by 2022 PA 178, sections 8, 13, 13b, 15, and 16 as amended by 2020 PA 259, section 8a as amended by 2017 PA 46, sections 13c and 14a as amended by 2021 PA 138, and section 14 as amended by 2016 PA 471. The House of Representatives has substituted (H-5) the bill. The House of Representatives has passed the bill as substituted (H-5), ordered that it be given immediate effect and amended the title to read as follows: A bill to amend 1996 PA 381, entitled “An act to authorize municipalities to create a brownfield redevelopment authority to facilitate the implementation of brownfield plans; to create brownfield redevelopment zones; to promote the revitalization, redevelopment, and reuse of certain property, including, but not limited to, tax reverted, blighted, or functionally obsolete property; to prescribe the powers and duties of brownfield redevelopment authorities; to permit the issuance of bonds and other evidences of indebtedness by an authority; to authorize the acquisition and disposal of certain property; to authorize certain funds; to prescribe certain powers and duties of certain state officers and agencies; and to authorize and permit the use of certain tax increment financing,” by amending the title and sections 2, 8, 8a, 11, 13, 13b, 13c, 14, 14a, 15, and 16 (MCL 125.2652, 125.2658, 125.2658a, 125.2661, 125.2663, 125.2663b, 125.2663c, 125.2664, 125.2664a, 125.2665, and 125.2666), the title as amended by 2003 PA 259, section 2 as amended by 2022 PA 178, sections 8, 13, 13b, 15, and 16 as amended by 2020 PA 259, sections 8a and 11 as amended by 2017 PA 46, sections 13c and 14a as amended by 2021 PA 138, and section 14 as amended by 2016 PA 471. Pending the order that, under rule 3.202, the bill be laid over one day, Senator Singh moved that the rule be suspended. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on concurring in the substitute made to the bill by the House, The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Excused
1
Measure id
measure-5769
Motion text
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Nays
12
Not voting
0
Result
unknown
Sitting id
sitting-609
Vote date
2023-06-28
Vote id
vote-7206
Vote number
428
Yeas
25

Related roll calls

The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows: