Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 4 related records on this page. A total was not computed.

Related record
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
Chamber
senate
Context text
Senator Anthony’s second statement is as follows: You know, I thought it was Tuesday but maybe it’s Flashback Friday because I remember many of those accounts back in 2012, back in 2020, in which many of these egregious acts that were pointed out by my colleague were presented. However, individuals on this side of the aisle were not in charge. It is surprising, or maybe not so surprising, that now in the minority party we want to have conversations about transparency and reforming the system. Again, I am proud of the work that has taken place in these subcommittees, and the fact that these budgets have been crafted with stakeholders in mind—with both the public, in the public square, being able to debate these issues. So again, I encourage more conversation, not just floor speeches, to address these many issues. The following bill was read a third time: Senate Bill No. 192, entitled A bill to make appropriations for the judiciary for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024; and to provide for the expenditure of the appropriations. The question being on the passage of the bill, Senator Outman offered the following amendment: 1. Amend page 2, line 23, after “76.0” by striking out “13,229,400” and inserting “14,241,900”, and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly. The question being on the adoption of the amendment, Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Excused
0
Measure id
measure-5832
Motion text
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Nays
21
Not voting
0
Result
failed
Sitting id
sitting-589
Vote date
2023-05-09
Vote id
vote-6953
Vote number
175
Yeas
17
Related record
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
Chamber
senate
Context text
1. Amend page 11, line 16, by striking out all of lines 16 through 27. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. Senator Outman offered the following amendments: 1. Amend page 5, line 17, after “resentencing—FTEs” by striking out “18.0” and inserting “11.0”. 2. Amend page 5, line 17, by striking out “2,529,600” and inserting “1,571,500”. 3. Amend page 7, following line 3, by inserting: “Montgomery v Louisiana—FTEs 7 958,100” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly. The question being on the adoption of the amendments, Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Excused
0
Measure id
measure-5832
Motion text
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Nays
20
Not voting
0
Result
failed
Sitting id
sitting-589
Vote date
2023-05-09
Vote id
vote-6954
Vote number
176
Yeas
18
Related record
The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
Chamber
senate
Context text
Not Voting—0 In The Chair: Moss Senator Theis offered the following amendments: 1. Amend page 6, following line 27, by inserting: “Expungement costs reimbursements 5,000,000” and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly. 2. Amend page 19, following line 3, by inserting: “Sec. 403. From the one-time general funds appropriated in part 1 for expungement costs reimbursements, the state court administrative office shall reimburse circuit and district courts statewide for fines and court costs deemed uncollectable on account of conviction expungements.”. The question being on the adoption of the amendments, Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Excused
0
Measure id
measure-5832
Motion text
The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Nays
20
Not voting
0
Result
failed
Sitting id
sitting-589
Vote date
2023-05-09
Vote id
vote-6955
Vote number
177
Yeas
18
Related record
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
Chamber
senate
Context text
Damoose Lauwers Nays—20 Anthony Chang Klinefelt Polehanki Bayer Cherry McCann Santana Brinks Geiss McDonald Rivet Shink Camilleri Hertel McMorrow Singh Cavanagh Irwin Moss Wojno Excused—0 Not Voting—0 In The Chair: Moss The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Excused
0
Measure id
measure-5832
Motion text
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Nays
18
Not voting
0
Result
passed
Sitting id
sitting-589
Vote date
2023-05-09
Vote id
vote-6956
Vote number
178
Yeas
20

Related roll calls

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:

The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:

The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:

The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows: