Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 3 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- 1. Amend page 12, following line 8, by inserting:
“Fentanyl mitigation and prevention grants 500,000,000”.
2. Amend page 12, following line 14, by inserting:
“Strategic outreach and attraction reserve fund 500,000,000”.
3. Amend page 112, following line 5, by inserting:
“Sec. 1022. (1) The funds appropriated in part 1 for fentanyl mitigation and prevention grants, $250,000,000 shall be allocated to local health departments to respond to public health effects of fentanyl use. The funding provided in this section shall be distributed in the same manner as the distribution formula for allocating essential local public health services funding to local health departments in made in the current fiscal year. Funds made available in this section shall be used for, but is not limited to, the adoption of comprehensive public health approaches to address the fentanyl crisis and to establish treatment and prevention services to avert future crises. The department may work with DHHS for assistance in distributing funds to local health departments.
(2) The funds appropriated in part 1 for fentanyl mitigation and prevention grants, $250,000,000 shall be allocated to local law enforcement agencies to assist in local efforts to address fentanyl mitigation activities. The department may work with the department of state police and the ANGEL program to assist in the allocation of funds to the communities most in need.
(3) Funds in the strategic outreach reserve fund shall be reduced by an equal amount.”.
The question being on the adoption of the amendments,
Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 2
- Motion text
- The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 20
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- failed
- Vote date
- 2024-05-14
- Vote number
- 146
- Yeas
- 16
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- received by the state agencies; and to declare the effect of this act.
The motion prevailed.
The House agreed to the title as amended.
Rep. Aiyash moved that the bill be given immediate effect.
The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.
Rep. Aiyash moved that Senate Bill No. 766 be placed on its immediate passage.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
Senate Bill No. 766, entitled
A bill to make appropriations for the department of labor and economic opportunity for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2025; and to provide for the expenditure of the appropriations.
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays,
as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- as follows:
- Nays
- 51
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2024-05-21
- Vote number
- 92
- Yeas
- 56
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Excused—0
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: Moss
Senate Bill No. 766, entitled
A bill to make appropriations for the department of labor and economic opportunity for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025; and to provide for the expenditure of the appropriations.
The House of Representatives has substituted (H-1) the bill.
The House of Representatives has passed the bill as substituted (H-1) and ordered that it be given immediate effect.
Pending the order that, under rule 3.202, the bill be laid over one day,
Senator Singh moved that the rule be suspended.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
The question being on concurring in the substitute made to the bill by the House,
The substitute was not concurred in, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Motion text
- The substitute was not concurred in, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 37
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2024-06-04
- Vote number
- 227
- Yeas
- 1