Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 1 related record on this page. A total was not computed.

1. Related record

   The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

   Open script-free record →

   Inspect published fields

   Chamber

   senate

   Context text

   the recently closed Ontonagon facility and it is the only provider of OB/GYN care on the western end of the Upper Peninsula, in Ontonagon County and for a number of the surrounding areas. That’s how important 340B has become for some of our rural areas. My amendment seeks to say that when a provider has multiple facilities, that they would have to be permitted to have more than one—at least two—pharmacies allowed to them in each county in which they have a physical presence. I support a “yes” vote. The following bill was read a third time: Senate Bill No. 952, entitled A bill to prohibit hospitals from attempting to collect debts incurred when not in compliance with price transparency laws; and to provide remedies. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

   Excused

   5

   Measure id

   measure-6592

   Motion text

   The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

   Nays

   0

   Not voting

   0

   Result

   passed

   Sitting id

   sitting-754

   Vote date

   2024-12-13

   Vote id

   vote-8097

   Vote number

   579

   Yeas

   33