Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 1 related record on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- from going beyond California as the most extreme state in America on this issue. I encourage a “yes” vote
on my amendment.
Senator Bayer’s statement is as follows:
I appreciate our colleague’s interest in this and he’s partially correct. Yes, those companies can continue
to have their loyalty programs and they can continue to sell everyone’s data but they need to tell us that they
are doing that and give us all the opportunity to say, “no thanks, not my data.” That is the only difference.
The following bill was read a third time:
Senate Bill No. 1169, entitled
A bill to amend 1994 PA 451, entitled “Natural resources and environmental protection act,” by amending
section 36202 (MCL 324.36202), as amended by 2016 PA 265.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 3
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 15
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2024-12-12
- Vote number
- 547
- Yeas
- 20