Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 1 related record on this page. A total was not computed.

1. Related record

   The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

   Open script-free record →

   Inspect published fields

   Chamber

   senate

   Context text

   The question being on the passage of the bill, Senator McBroom offered the following amendments: 1. Amend page 2, following line 1, by inserting: “(c) If a 340B entity has more than 1 facility, prohibit the 340B entity from entering into a contract with not more than 2 pharmacies in each county where the 340B entity is physically present to receive a 340B drug on behalf of the 340B entity. A pharmacy that is located on the premises of the 340B entity is not considered a pharmacy for purposes of this subdivision.” and by relettering the remaining subdivision. 2. Amend page 2, line 4, after “subdivision” by striking out “(a) or (b)” and inserting “(a), (b), or (c)”. The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

   Excused

   5

   Measure id

   measure-6819

   Motion text

   The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

   Nays

   3

   Not voting

   0

   Result

   passed

   Sitting id

   sitting-754

   Vote date

   2024-12-13

   Vote id

   vote-8096

   Vote number

   578

   Yeas

   30