Michigan Legislative Activity Ledger

Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 2 related records on this page. A total was not computed.

  1. Related record

    Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    Rep. Posthumus moved that the bill be given immediate effect. The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor. Rep. Jaime Greene, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: I voted NO because this ban is unnecessary government overreach that restricts career freedom and violates free-market principles. Conservatives believe in limiting government, not individual opportunity. Former legislators should be able to use their expertise in the private sector without excessive regulation. If the concern is undue influence, the solution isn’t banning careers—it’s making government smaller and more transparent. The bigger the government, the more lobbying exists. Instead of limiting people’s choices, we should be limiting government power.” Rep. Weiss, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: I believe that there are several steps we need to take in Michigan to improve transparency in government and to limit the influence of powerful special interest groups over individual constituents. I appreciate the effort here to limit the ability of elected officials becoming lobbyists soon after they end their term. However, without larger ethics reform, particularly the FOIA package that the senate recently passed, this legislation is only a half measure that will accomplish nothing more than requiring a different job title such as ‘consultant’ instead of ‘lobbyist’ within that two year timeframe after a member of the legislature completes their term.” House Bill No. 4063, entitled A bill to amend 1978 PA 472, entitled “An act to regulate political activity; to regulate lobbyists, lobbyist agents, and lobbying activities; to require registration of lobbyists and lobbyist agents; to require the filing of reports; to prescribe the powers and duties of the department of state; to prescribe penalties; and to repeal certain acts and parts of acts,” (MCL 4.411 to 4.431) by adding section 6b. Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-74
    Motion text
    Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
    Nays
    13
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    passed
    Sitting id
    sitting-20
    Vote date
    2025-02-20
    Vote id
    vote-1321
    Vote number
    10
    Yeas
    96
  2. Related record

    as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    The Senate has passed the bill as substituted (S-2), ordered that it be given immediate effect and amended the title to read as follows: A bill to amend 1978 PA 472, entitled “An act to regulate political activity; to regulate lobbyists, lobbyist agents, and lobbying activities; to require registration of lobbyists and lobbyist agents; to require the filing of reports; to prescribe the powers and duties of the department of state; to prescribe penalties; and to repeal certain acts and parts of acts,” (MCL 4.411 to 4.431) by adding section 6d. The Speaker announced that pursuant to Rule 41, the bill was laid over one day. Rep. Posthumus moved that Rule 41 be suspended. The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor. The question being on concurring in the (S-2) made to the bill by the Senate, The substitute (S-2) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-74
    Motion text
    as follows:
    Nays
    15
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    unknown
    Sitting id
    sitting-359
    Vote date
    2026-07-03
    Vote id
    vote-2013
    Vote number
    327
    Yeas
    92