Michigan Legislative Activity Ledger

Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 2 related records on this page. A total was not computed.

  1. Related record

    Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    Rep. Jaime Greene, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: I voted NO because this proposal is unnecessary government interference in the free market. As conservatives, we believe in limiting government, not career opportunities. Former governors should have the same right as anyone else to apply their experience in the private sector. The real issue isn’t former governors becoming lobbyists—it’s big government creating the need for lobbying in the first place. Instead of restricting careers, we should reduce government influence and increase transparency.” Rep. Young, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: Elected officials, not employees or officers within state government should be held to a higher standard as public officials.” Rep. Weiss, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: I believe that there are several steps we need to take in Michigan to improve transparency in government and to limit the influence of powerful special interest groups over individual constituents. I appreciate the effort here to limit the ability of elected officials becoming lobbyists soon after they end their term. However, without larger ethics reform, particularly the FOIA package that the senate recently passed, this legislation is only a half measure that will accomplish nothing more than requiring a different job title such as ‘consultant’ instead of ‘lobbyist’ within that two year timeframe after a member of the legislature completes their term.” House Bill No. 4064, entitled A bill to amend 1978 PA 472, entitled “An act to regulate political activity; to regulate lobbyists, lobbyist agents, and lobbying activities; to require registration of lobbyists and lobbyist agents; to require the filing of reports; to prescribe the powers and duties of the department of state; to prescribe penalties; and to repeal certain acts and parts of acts,” (MCL 4.411 to 4.431) by adding section 6c. Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-75
    Motion text
    Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
    Nays
    6
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    passed
    Sitting id
    sitting-20
    Vote date
    2025-02-20
    Vote id
    vote-1322
    Vote number
    11
    Yeas
    103
  2. Related record

    as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    A bill to amend 1978 PA 472, entitled “An act to regulate political activity; to regulate lobbyists, lobbyist agents, and lobbying activities; to require registration of lobbyists and lobbyist agents; to require the filing of reports; to prescribe the powers and duties of the department of state; to prescribe penalties; and to repeal certain acts and parts of acts,” (MCL 4.411 to 4.431) by adding section 6c. The Senate has substituted (S-1) the bill. The Senate has passed the bill as substituted (S-1) and ordered that it be given immediate effect. The Speaker announced that pursuant to Rule 41, the bill was laid over one day. Rep. Posthumus moved that Rule 41 be suspended. The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor. The question being on concurring in the (S-1) made to the bill by the Senate, The substitute (S-1) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-75
    Motion text
    as follows:
    Nays
    13
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    unknown
    Sitting id
    sitting-359
    Vote date
    2026-07-03
    Vote id
    vote-2014
    Vote number
    328
    Yeas
    94