Michigan Legislative Activity Ledger

Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 3 related records on this page. A total was not computed.

  1. Related record

    as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    voting therefor. Rep. Steven Johnson moved that the bill be placed on the order of Third Reading of Bills. The motion prevailed. Rep. Frederick moved that the bill be placed on its immediate passage. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of Third Reading of Bills House Bill No. 5570, entitled A bill to amend 2000 PA 403, entitled “Motor fuel tax act,” by amending sections 2, 3, and 8 (MCL 207.1002, 207.1003, and 207.1008), as amended by 2015 PA 176. Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-8409
    Motion text
    as follows:
    Nays
    39
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    unknown
    Sitting id
    sitting-886
    Vote date
    2022-03-09
    Vote id
    vote-8994
    Vote number
    100
    Yeas
    63
  2. Related record

    The resolution was adopted, a majority of the members present voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    Commission, the Secretary of the United States Department of Energy, the Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, and the entire Michigan congressional delegation. The question being on the adoption of the resolution, The resolution was adopted. Rep. Frederick moved to reconsider the vote by which the House adopted the resolution. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on the adoption of the resolution, Rep. Frederick demanded the yeas and nays. The demand was supported. The question being on the adoption of the resolution, The resolution was adopted, a majority of the members present voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-8409
    Motion text
    The resolution was adopted, a majority of the members present voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Nays
    40
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    adopted
    Sitting id
    sitting-886
    Vote date
    2022-03-09
    Vote id
    vote-8995
    Vote number
    101
    Yeas
    62
  3. Related record

    The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    senate
    Context text
    The motion prevailed. The following bill was read a third time: House Bill No. 5570, entitled A bill to amend 2000 PA 403, entitled “Motor fuel tax act,” by amending sections 8 and 152 (MCL 207.1008 and 207.1152), as amended by 2015 PA 176. The question being on the passage of the bill, Senator Geiss offered the following amendment: 1. Amend page 4, following line 21, by inserting: “ (11) A person conducting business within the chain of distribution of energy products must not charge a price that is grossly in excess of the price at which similar products or services are sold or charge an excessively increased price for energy products or services, or offer for sale an energy product or service at an excessively increased price, during or reasonably after a market disruption. (12) The attorney general may bring an action for appropriate injunctive or other equitable relief and civil fines in the name of the people of this state for a violation of subsection (10) or (11). The court may assess for the benefit of this state a civil fine for each violation of subsection (10) or (11). For an individual, the fine shall not be more than $10,000.00 per violation. For a person other than an individual, the fine shall not be more than $1,000,000.00 per violation. ”. Senator Chang requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
    Excused
    0
    Measure id
    measure-8409
    Motion text
    The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
    Nays
    22
    Not voting
    0
    Result
    failed
    Sitting id
    sitting-1077
    Vote date
    2022-03-15
    Vote id
    vote-9991
    Vote number
    80
    Yeas
    16