Michigan Legislative Activity Ledger

Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 2 related records on this page. A total was not computed.

  1. Related record

    The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    senate
    Context text
    Senator Brinks asked and was granted unanimous consent to make a statement and moved that the statement be printed in the Journal. The motion prevailed. Senator Brinks’ statement is as follows: Colleagues, like many of you, I’ve picked up a couple of nicknames along the way in this job, for better or for worse, but one I wear with honor is the “tampon tax lady”. I’m proud to have a part in eliminating the sales and use tax on these medically necessary products, a move that will put $7 million back in the pockets of Michigan families. This is a commonsense move that will reduce an unfair tax burden that is placed on only half of Michigan’s population, for a significant portion of our lives. Establishing parity between these products and things such as medical devices just makes sense. A growing number of states and countries have already eliminated these taxes, and the U.S. federal government, under the last administration, recognized feminine hygiene products as a qualified medical expense for health savings accounts. With your support, these bills will move Michigan toward a fairer tax structure, which is a goal I think we all share, regardless of which side of the aisle we sit on. Finally, I want to note that eliminating the “tampon tax” is an issue that I’ve been working towards since I was a member of the House of Representatives. Like many good policies, it can take years to finally get these bills over the finish line. For much of the past decade, Senators and Representatives have introduced this legislation and continued the conversation about its importance. Of the currently serving legislators who have committed their time and attention to this effort, I find myself in the position of being the one who has carried the torch the longest. With this issue, like so many others, I stand on the shoulders of those who come before me, and I also want to express my gratitude to them, and to those who walked alongside me to get this legislation to this point today. Thank you Mr. President; and colleagues, I welcome your support. The following bill was read a third time: Senate Bill No. 153, entitled A bill to amend 1937 PA 94, entitled “Use tax act,” by amending sections 4 and 21 (MCL 205.94 and 205.111), section 4 as amended by 2018 PA 679 and section 21 as amended by 2020 PA 30. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Excused
    2
    Measure id
    measure-8655
    Motion text
    The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Nays
    2
    Not voting
    0
    Result
    passed
    Sitting id
    sitting-1035
    Vote date
    2021-10-26
    Vote id
    vote-9817
    Vote number
    414
    Yeas
    32
  2. Related record

    Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    consider that communities like Hamtramck and Benton Harbor struggle to provide clean water and with crime rates rising there is a need to increase funding for law enforcement. This is just a few of the issues that local government struggles with.” Rep. Rogers, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: I voted no on HB 4940 because it gives a nearly $31 million decrease to general fund and will affect revenue sharing to local municipalities.” Senate Bill No. 153, entitled A bill to amend 1937 PA 94, entitled “Use tax act,” by amending sections 4 and 21 (MCL 205.94 and 205.111), section 4 as amended by 2018 PA 679 and section 21 as amended by 2020 PA 30. Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-8655
    Motion text
    Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Nays
    12
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    passed
    Sitting id
    sitting-850
    Vote date
    2021-11-03
    Vote id
    vote-8778
    Vote number
    525
    Yeas
    91