Michigan Legislative Activity Ledger

Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 3 related records on this page. A total was not computed.

  1. Related record

    The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    senate
    Context text
    Alexander Polehanki Santana Theis Johnson Runestad Excused—1 Barrett Not Voting—0 In The Chair: President The Senate agreed to the title of the bill. The following bill was read a third time: Senate Bill No. 445, entitled A bill to amend 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1, entitled “Michigan employment security act,” by amending section 28 (MCL 421.28), as amended by 2020 PA 229. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Excused
    1
    Measure id
    measure-8947
    Motion text
    The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Nays
    0
    Not voting
    0
    Result
    passed
    Sitting id
    sitting-1007
    Vote date
    2021-06-17
    Vote id
    vote-9687
    Vote number
    284
    Yeas
    35
  2. Related record

    Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    Rep. Frederick moved that the bill be given immediate effect. The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor. Rep. Yancey, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: In this day and age where we are asking to rename statues. buildings and monuments to ensure we are not honoring racists, I do not feel that we should continue naming these things, including highways without knowing who they are and what they stand for.” Rep. Hope, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: I support higher education, and I support job training. However, this bill is corporate welfare with little accountability for the businesses who take advantage of this program. This money is used only to train prospective employees to the company’s specifications; it cannot be used for those employees to pursue additional training or to fulfill their other educational goals. Lastly, this bill requires that employers pay little more than $16/hour. These are not career jobs; they are subsistence jobs. And Michigan taxpayers wind up footing the bill.” Senate Bill No. 445, entitled A bill to amend 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1, entitled “Michigan employment security act,” by amending section 28 (MCL 421.28), as amended by 2020 PA 229. Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-8947
    Motion text
    Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Nays
    3
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    passed
    Sitting id
    sitting-879
    Vote date
    2022-02-22
    Vote id
    vote-8961
    Vote number
    67
    Yeas
    101
  3. Related record

    The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    senate
    Context text
    By unanimous consent the Senate returned to the order of Messages from the House Senate Bill No. 445, entitled A bill to amend 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1, entitled “Michigan employment security act,” by amending section 28 (MCL 421.28), as amended by 2020 PA 229. The House of Representatives has substituted (H-1) the bill. The House of Representatives has passed the bill as substituted (H-1), ordered that it be given immediate effect and amended the title to read as follows: A bill to amend 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1, entitled “An act to protect the welfare of the people of this state through the establishment of an unemployment compensation fund, and to provide for the disbursement thereof; to create certain other funds; to create the Michigan employment security commission, and to prescribe its powers and duties; to provide for the protection of the people of this state from the hazards of unemployment; to levy and provide for contributions from employers; to levy and provide for obligation assessments; to provide for the collection of those contributions and assessments; to enter into reciprocal agreements and to cooperate with agencies of the United States and of other states charged with the administration of any unemployment insurance law; to furnish certain information to certain governmental agencies for use in administering public benefit and child support programs and investigating and prosecuting fraud; to provide for the payment of benefits; to provide for appeals from redeterminations, decisions and notices of assessments; and for referees and a board of review to hear and decide the issues arising from redeterminations, decisions and notices of assessment; to provide for the cooperation of this state and compliance with the provisions of the social security act and the Wagner-Peyser act passed by the Congress of the United States of America; to provide for the establishment and maintenance of free public employment offices; to provide for the transfer of funds; to make appropriations for carrying out the provisions of this act; to prescribe remedies and penalties for the violation of this act; and to repeal all acts and parts of acts inconsistent with this act,” by amending section 28 (MCL 421.28), as amended by 2021 PA 66 . Pending the order that, under rule 3.202, the bill be laid over one day, Senator Lauwers moved that the rule be suspended. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on concurring in the substitute made to the bill by the House, The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Excused
    0
    Measure id
    measure-8947
    Motion text
    The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Nays
    0
    Not voting
    0
    Result
    unknown
    Sitting id
    sitting-1069
    Vote date
    2022-02-23
    Vote id
    vote-9950
    Vote number
    39
    Yeas
    38