Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 5 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Senator Lauwers moved that the Senate proceed to consideration of the following bill:
Senate Bill No. 768
The motion prevailed.
The following bill was read a third time:
Senate Bill No. 768, entitled
A bill to amend 1967 PA 281, entitled “Income tax act of 1967,” by amending sections 30, 51, and 623 (MCL 206.30, 206.51, and 206.623), section 30 as amended by 2022 PA 5, section 51 as amended by 2020 PA 75, and section 623 as amended by 2021 PA 135, and by adding section 277.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Ananich offered the following substitute:
Substitute (S-3).
Senator Chang requested the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The substitute was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Motion text
- The substitute was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 22
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- failed
- Vote date
- 2022-02-15
- Vote number
- 28
- Yeas
- 16
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Barrett Johnson Outman Theis
Bizon LaSata Runestad VanderWall
Bumstead Lauwers Schmidt Victory
Daley MacDonald Shirkey Wozniak
Horn McBroom Stamas Zorn
Huizenga Nesbitt
Excused—0
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: Theis
The President, Lieutenant Governor Gilchrist, resumed the Chair.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 16
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2022-02-15
- Vote number
- 29
- Yeas
- 22
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- Rep. Frederick moved that the bill be placed on the order of Third Reading of Bills.
The motion prevailed.
Rep. Frederick moved that the bill be placed on its immediate passage.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of
Third Reading of Bills
Senate Bill No. 768, entitled
A bill to amend 1967 PA 281, entitled “Income tax act of 1967,” by amending sections 30, 51, and 623
(MCL 206.30, 206.51, and 206.623), section 30 as amended by 2022 PA 5, section 51 as amended by 2020
PA 75, and section 623 as amended by 2021 PA 135, and by adding section 277.
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays,
as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- as follows:
- Nays
- 42
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2022-03-01
- Vote number
- 83
- Yeas
- 62
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Senator Hertel’s statement is as follows:
I love the fact that we are going to have to now vote on a separate bill that would take longer to actually do what you want because you are afraid to vote “yes” on my amendment. I appreciate all the time and attention that’s been played to that. But to quote John Kerry, “I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it.” Welcome to that moment in your future debate—whatever else you run for. Have a nice day.
By unanimous consent the Senate returned to the order of
Messages from the House
By unanimous consent the Senate returned to consideration of the following bill:
Senate Bill No. 768, entitled
A bill to amend 1967 PA 281, entitled “Income tax act of 1967,” by amending sections 30 and 51 (MCL 206.30 and 206.51), section 30 as amended by 2022 PA 5 and section 51 as amended by 2020 PA 75, and by adding section 277.
(This bill was considered earlier today, amendment offered and consideration postponed. See p. 255.)
The question being on the adoption of the amendment to the House substitute offered by Senator Hertel,
Senator Chang requested the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 16
- Not voting
- 4
- Result
- failed
- Vote date
- 2022-03-03
- Vote number
- 59
- Yeas
- 17
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Nays—16
Alexander Bullock Hollier McMorrow
Ananich Chang Horn Moss
Bayer Geiss Irwin Polehanki
Brinks Hertel McCann Wojno
Excused—1
Santana
Not Voting—4
LaSata Schmidt Shirkey Stamas
In The Chair: President
The question being on concurring in the substitute made to the bill by the House,
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 15
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2022-03-03
- Vote number
- 60
- Yeas
- 22