Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The amendments were concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The amendments were concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2022-06-15
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- unknown
- Yeas
- 37
- Nays
- 0
- Excused
- 1
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-8949
- Related sitting
- sitting-1108
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Bumstead Johnson Runestad Wozniak Chang LaSata Santana Zorn Nays—0 Excused—1 Lauwers Not Voting—1 McBroom In The Chair: Nesbitt Senator LaSata moved to reconsider the vote by which the House amendments were concurred in. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on concurring in the amendments made to the bill by the House, The amendments were concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Measure id
- measure-8949
- Motion text
- The amendments were concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Sitting id
- sitting-1108
- Vote date
- 2022-06-15
- Vote id
- vote-10215
- Vote number
- 304
- Yeas
- 37
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The amendments were concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-10215.
/api/v1/votes/vote-10215