Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The substitute (S-3) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The substitute (S-3) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2025-02-20
- Chamber
- house
- Result
- unknown
- Yeas
- 81
- Nays
- 29
- Excused
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-1
- Related sitting
- sitting-20
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor. The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-3) made to the bill by the Senate, Rep. Myers-Phillips moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3) as follows: 1. Amend page 3, line 6, by striking out all of subparagraph ( ii ) and renumbering the remaining subparagraphs. The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. Rep. Myers-Phillips moved to amend the Senate substitute (S-3) as follows: 1. Amend page 17, line 27, after “may” by striking out the balance of the subsection and inserting “do any of the following: (a) Bring a civil action for appropriate relief, including, but not limited to, payment for used earned sick time; rehiring or reinstatement to the employee’s previous job; payment of back wages; reestablishment of employee benefits to which the employee otherwise would have been eligible if the employee had not been subjected to retaliatory personnel action or discrimination; the violation; and an equal additional amount as liquidated damages together with costs and reasonable attorney fees as the court allows. (b) File a claim with the department, which shall investigate the claim. Filing a claim with the department is neither a prerequisite nor a bar to bringing a civil action.”. The motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-3) made to the bill by the Senate, The substitute (S-3) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Measure id
- measure-1
- Motion text
- The substitute (S-3) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 29
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Sitting id
- sitting-20
- Vote date
- 2025-02-20
- Vote id
- vote-1323
- Vote number
- 12
- Yeas
- 81
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The substitute (S-3) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:,” /votes/vote-1323.
/api/v1/votes/vote-1323