Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2025-06-25
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- passed
- Yeas
- 19
- Nays
- 17
- Excused
- 1
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-2377
- Related sitting
- sitting-124
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- 5. Amend page 2, line 24, after “facility” by inserting “or place of religious worship”. 6. Amend page 2, line 26, after “services” by inserting “or because a place of religious worship is a place of religious worship”. 7. Amend page 5, line 1, after “a” by inserting “place of religious worship or a”. The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. Senator Runestad offered the following amendment: 1. Amend page 2, line 6, after “means” by striking out the balance of the subdivision and inserting a colon and: “( i ) Except as provided in subparagraph ( ii ) and subject to subparagraph ( iii ), to knowingly and intentionally engage in conduct that would place a reasonable individual in fear of imminent bodily harm to the individual’s self or to another individual, so long as such fear is objectively reasonable under the circumstances. ( ii ) Mere presence, verbal expression, or conduct protected under section 5 of article I of the state constitution of 1963 and the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States does not, without more, constitute intimidation. ( iii ) This subsection must not be construed to prohibit constitutionally protected activity, including peaceful picketing or other expressive conduct, unless such activity is undertaken with the specific intent to place another individual in fear of imminent bodily harm.”. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Measure id
- measure-2377
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 17
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Sitting id
- sitting-124
- Vote date
- 2025-06-25
- Vote id
- vote-2206
- Vote number
- 178
- Yeas
- 19
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-2206.
/api/v1/votes/vote-2206