Michigan Legislative Activity Ledger

Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3

The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.

vote

Recorded floor vote

The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

Vote date
2023-10-19
Chamber
senate
Result
passed
Yeas
38
Nays
0
Excused
0
Not voting
0
Related measure
measure-6158
Related sitting
sitting-637

Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.

Inspect all published fields
Chamber
senate
Context text
Not Voting—0 In The Chair: Geiss The Senate agreed to the title of the bill. Protest Senator McBroom, under his constitutional right of protest (Art. 4, Sec. 18), protested against the passage of Senate Bill No. 466. Senator McBroom’s statement is as follows: This bill should have been considered a local act and not a general act. When reading the provisions of it, it’s very clear that it doesn’t even mask its intentions as being a local act in the normal way that we would usually mask something like that. It is, I believe, an unconstitutional act in that regard and therefore I voted “no.” The following bill was read a third time: Senate Bill No. 518, entitled A bill to amend 1976 PA 451, entitled “The revised school code,” by amending section 1531i (MCL 380.1531i), as amended by 2020 PA 316. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Excused
0
Measure id
measure-6158
Motion text
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Nays
0
Not voting
0
Result
passed
Sitting id
sitting-637
Vote date
2023-10-19
Vote id
vote-7356
Vote number
578
Yeas
38

Follow the evidence

Cite this record

Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-7356.

/api/v1/votes/vote-7356