Michigan Legislative Activity Ledger

Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3

The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.

vote

Recorded floor vote

The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

Vote date
2024-05-09
Chamber
senate
Result
passed
Yeas
20
Nays
16
Excused
2
Not voting
0
Related measure
measure-6388
Related sitting
sitting-691

Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.

Inspect all published fields
Chamber
senate
Context text
I just want to let members know that this budget line item does not actually authorize any new fees. When you vote on this item, you should know that the previous speaker and those comments were not in line with what’s in the bill. This does not authorize any fees; in fact, the Legislature would have to authorize those fees. I hope it’s a discussion we have here because out-of-state trash and the fact Michigan is a huge magnet for out-of-state trash is a problem that this Legislature has been wrestling with for years. This budget does not fix that, this line does not increase any fees, and that discussion will happen elsewhere. Senator Bellino’s statement is as follows: Just like millions of families, many local communities across our state continue to struggle with increased costs. We should be helping our locals maintain the level of service their residents need or improve the aging water infrastructure their families rely on. Instead, this budget subsidizes the higher cost of electric vehicles for local fleets. If a community wants to buy EVs, then they should use their own resources to cover the extra cost, not get a bailout by the taxpayers. My amendment would take the $10 million dedicated in this budget for “clean fleet” grants to government bodies and repurpose it for lead line replacement services. I urge a “yes” vote on my amendment. Senator Hauck’s statement is as follows: Mr. President, many communities across our state continue to struggle to afford to improve their aging water infrastructure. This is the type of critical priority where we can make long-term investments and improve the lives of millions of Michigan families. My amendment would cut $15 million in this budget for clean fuel and charging infrastructure, and dedicate it to water infrastructure. Focusing on safe drinking water for all is a more responsible use of public funds, ensuring essential resources that benefits all Michiganders, not just those who can afford an electric vehicle. I urge my members to meet our current needs by voting “yes” on this amendment. Senator Outman’s statement is as follows: Mr. President, it’s no secret that inflation has increased the cost of virtually everything in recent years. Just like families have been grappling with these added expenses, local governments find themselves facing similar challenges. This project has already been approved and we should protect the health of these residents and avoid penalizing this community for factors beyond their control. My amendment would fund the shortfall and ensure this critical project can be completed as originally planned. I ask for your support on this amendment. The following bill was read a third time: Senate Bill No. 748, entitled A bill to make appropriations for the department of lifelong education, advancement, and potential for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025; and to provide for the expenditure of the appropriations. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Excused
2
Measure id
measure-6388
Motion text
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Nays
16
Not voting
0
Result
passed
Sitting id
sitting-691
Vote date
2024-05-09
Vote id
vote-7652
Vote number
134
Yeas
20

Follow the evidence

Cite this record

Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-7652.

/api/v1/votes/vote-7652