Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2024-12-13
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- passed
- Yeas
- 21
- Nays
- 12
- Excused
- 5
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-6732
- Related sitting
- sitting-754
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- likely to be killed in the line of duty, less likely to be assaulted, and have similar likelihood of sustaining an injury during an assault. Michiganders overwhelmingly support police improvement and community trust proposals, and I’m proud to have the support of many law enforcement organizations for these bills. I ask for a “yes” vote. The following bill was read a third time: Senate Bill No. 1092, entitled A bill to amend 1965 PA 203, entitled “Michigan commission on law enforcement standards act,” by amending the title and sections 9, 9b, 9c, and 9d (MCL 28.609, 28.609b, 28.609c, and 28.609d), the title as amended by 1998 PA 237 and sections 9, 9b, 9c, and 9d as amended by 2018 PA 552, and by adding sections 9f and 9g. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 5
- Measure id
- measure-6732
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 12
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Sitting id
- sitting-754
- Vote date
- 2024-12-13
- Vote id
- vote-8139
- Vote number
- 621
- Yeas
- 21
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-8139.
/api/v1/votes/vote-8139