Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2021-11-10
- Chamber
- house
- Result
- passed
- Yeas
- 103
- Nays
- 2
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Related measure
- measure-8286
- Related sitting
- sitting-853
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- Alexander Fink Maddock Rabhi Allor Glenn Outman Slagh Beeler Hoitenga In The Chair: Hornberger The House agreed to the title of the bill. Rep. Frederick moved that the bill be given immediate effect. The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor. House Bill No. 5447, entitled A bill to amend 1929 PA 269, entitled “An act to protect benevolent, humane, fraternal or charitable corporations in the use of their names and emblems; to provide penalties for the violation thereof; and to repeal Act No. 255 of the Public Acts of 1909,” by amending section 1 (MCL 430.51). Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Measure id
- measure-8286
- Motion text
- Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 2
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- passed
- Sitting id
- sitting-853
- Vote date
- 2021-11-10
- Vote id
- vote-8806
- Vote number
- 553
- Yeas
- 103
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:,” /votes/vote-8806.
/api/v1/votes/vote-8806