Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
Committee vote · not_prevailed · 12–16–0
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
committee vote
Recorded committee decision
to adopt the amendment. The committee debated the amendment.
- Meeting date
- Not recorded
- Result
- not prevailed
- Yeas
- 12
- Nays
- 16
- Validation
- consistent
- Related meeting
- meeting-2579
A committee motion is a proceeding-level decision. A named choice supports that individual vote only and does not establish continuous attendance.
Inspect all published fields
- Canonical name
- John Cherry
- Committee vote id
- committee-vote-264523
- Evidence text
- Representative Cherry moved to adopt the amendment. The committee debated the amendment. The motion did not prevail by a vote of 12-16-0. UNFAVORABLE ROLL CALL: Yeas: Reps. Hoadley, Love, Pagan, Hammoud, Peterson, Sabo, Anthony, Brixie, Cherry, Hood, Kennedy, and Tate. Nays: Reps. Hernandez, Miller, Albert, Allor, Brann, VanSingel, Whiteford, Yaroch, Bollin, Glenn, Green, Huizenga, Lightner, Maddock, Slagh, and VanWoerkom. Pass: None. Representative Tate offered the following amendments for HB 4234, as substitute (H-1): 1. Amend page 37, following line 11, by inserting: "Blight removal grants........................................................................................ $ 350,100" and adjusting the subtotals, totals, and section 201 accordingly. 2. Amend page 159, following line 17, by inserting: “Sec. 998. (1) From the funds appropriated in part 1 for blight removal grants, $350,000.00 shall be awarded to blight removal projects located in counties with populations under 50,000 with priority given to communities with the greatest population loss since 2000 and cap individual grants at no more than $50,000.00. (2) From the funds appropriated in part 1 for blight removal grants, $100.00 shall be awarded to blight removal projects in a city with a population of greater than 600,000 as of the most recent federal decennial census.”. Representative Tate explained the amendments.
- Meeting id
- meeting-2579
- Member id
- member-121
- Motion text
- to adopt the amendment. The committee debated the amendment.
- Mover label
- Cherry
- Nays
- 16
- Passes
- 0
- Position
- 22
- Resolution method
- unique surname
- Result
- not prevailed
- Service id
- service-499
- Validation state
- consistent
- Yeas
- 12
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “Committee vote · not_prevailed · 12–16–0,” /committee-votes/committee-vote-264523.
/api/v1/committee-votes/committee-vote-264523