Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
Committee vote · not_prevailed · 12–17–0
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
committee vote
Recorded committee decision
to adopt the amendments to HB 4409, as substitute (H-1).
- Meeting date
- Not recorded
- Result
- not prevailed
- Yeas
- 12
- Nays
- 17
- Validation
- consistent
- Related meeting
- meeting-1329
A committee motion is a proceeding-level decision. A named choice supports that individual vote only and does not establish continuous attendance.
Inspect all published fields
- Canonical name
- Samantha Steckloff
- Committee vote id
- committee-vote-275567
- Evidence text
- Representative Steckloff moved to adopt the amendments to HB 4409, as substitute (H-1). The motion did not prevail 12-17-0: UNFAVORABLE ROLL CALL Yeas: Reps. Tate, Hammoud, Peterson, Sabo, Tyrone Carter, Hood, Cynthia Johnson, Brabec, O'Neal, Steckloff, Thanedar, Weiss. Nays: Reps. Albert, Whiteford, Allor, Brann, Hornberger, VanSingel, Yaroch, Bollin, Glenn, Huizenga, Lightner, Maddock, Slagh, VanWoerkom, Beson, Borton, Fink. Pass: None. Representative Steckloff offered the following amendment to HB 4409, as substitute (H-1): 1. Amend page 30, following line 7, by inserting: "Sec. 395.(1).From funds appropriated in part 1, the department shall conduct a study of alternative user fees that could be used to enhance, preserve, and maintain state and local road systems in this state and public-transportation programs in this state. (2) At a minimum, the study must include all of the following: (a) A list of alternative user fees that could practically and appropriately be imposed on users of roads and public-transportation systems in this state, including an estimate of the revenue that might be generated by alternative user fees as compared with the amounts needed to prevent decline in system condition, and an assessment of the incidence, fairness, efficiency, and economic impact of alternative user fee options on the Michigan economy. (b) Alternative user fees recommended for further study. (c) Alternative user fees and revenue sources not recommended for further study. (d) Recommendations for amendments, reforms, or repeals of existing motor fuel taxes and vehicle registration taxes. (3) The department shall transmit the results of the study required by this section no later than September 30, 2022, to the speaker of the house of representatives, the house minority leader, the senate majority leader, the senate minority leader, and the house and senate standing committees on transportation. The results of the study must be posted to the department’s website.. (4) As used in this section, "alternative user fees" means fee or tax revenue imposed on users of transportation systems made possible by technology and that has the potential of supplementing or replacing current motor fuel taxes and vehicle registration taxes."
- Meeting id
- meeting-1329
- Member id
- member-102
- Motion text
- to adopt the amendments to HB 4409, as substitute (H-1).
- Mover label
- Steckloff
- Nays
- 17
- Passes
- 0
- Position
- 13
- Resolution method
- unique surname
- Result
- not prevailed
- Service id
- service-335
- Validation state
- consistent
- Yeas
- 12
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “Committee vote · not_prevailed · 12–17–0,” /committee-votes/committee-vote-275567.
/api/v1/committee-votes/committee-vote-275567