Michigan Legislative Activity Ledger

Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 2 related records on this page. A total was not computed.

  1. Related record

    The motion prevailed, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    senate
    Context text
    The following communication was received: Office of Senator Jeremy Moss February 13, 2019 I would like to add my name as co-sponsor to Senate Bill 14 introduced by Sen. Winnie Brinks. Jeremy Moss The communication was referred to the Secretary for record. Senator MacGregor moved that the rules be suspended and that the following concurrent resolution, now on Committee Reports, be placed on the Resolutions calendar for consideration today: House Concurrent Resolution No. 1 The motion did not prevail, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. Senator MacGregor requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:
    Excused
    0
    Measure id
    measure-11965
    Motion text
    The motion prevailed, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:
    Nays
    16
    Not voting
    0
    Result
    unknown
    Sitting id
    sitting-1368
    Vote date
    2019-02-14
    Vote id
    vote-11538
    Vote number
    6
    Yeas
    22
  2. Related record

    The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    senate
    Context text
    Ananich Chang Irwin Polehanki Excused—0 Not Voting—0 In The Chair: President Resolutions House Concurrent Resolution No. 1. A concurrent resolution to disapprove Executive Order No. 2019-02. The question being on the adoption of the concurrent resolution, The concurrent resolution was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. Senator MacGregor requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Excused
    0
    Measure id
    measure-11965
    Motion text
    The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Nays
    16
    Not voting
    0
    Result
    adopted
    Sitting id
    sitting-1368
    Vote date
    2019-02-14
    Vote id
    vote-11539
    Vote number
    7
    Yeas
    22