Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2019-02-14
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- adopted
- Yeas
- 22
- Nays
- 16
- Excused
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-11965
- Related sitting
- sitting-1368
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Ananich Chang Irwin Polehanki Excused—0 Not Voting—0 In The Chair: President Resolutions House Concurrent Resolution No. 1. A concurrent resolution to disapprove Executive Order No. 2019-02. The question being on the adoption of the concurrent resolution, The concurrent resolution was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. Senator MacGregor requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Measure id
- measure-11965
- Motion text
- The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 16
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- adopted
- Sitting id
- sitting-1368
- Vote date
- 2019-02-14
- Vote id
- vote-11539
- Vote number
- 7
- Yeas
- 22
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-11539.
/api/v1/votes/vote-11539