Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 3 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Senate Bill No. 460
Senate Bill No. 530
Senate Bill No. 473
Senate Bill No. 474
Senate Bill No. 475
Senate Bill No. 476
The motion prevailed.
The following bill was read a third time:
Senate Bill No. 455, entitled
A bill to amend 1893 PA 206, entitled The general property tax act, by amending section 7ff (MCL 211.7ff), as amended by 2005 PA 165.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- Not recorded
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2019-09-24
- Vote number
- 230
- Yeas
- Not recorded
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- “An act to provide for the levy, assessment, and collection of a specific excise tax on the storage, use, or consumption in this state of tangible personal property and certain services; to appropriate the proceeds of that tax; to prescribe penalties; and to make appropriations,”.
The Senate agreed to the full title.
By unanimous consent the Senate returned to the order of
Messages from the House
Senator MacGregor moved that the Senate proceed to consideration of the following bill:
Senate Bill No. 455
The motion prevailed.
Senate Bill No. 455, entitled
A bill to amend 1893 PA 206, entitled “The general property tax act,” by amending section 7ff (MCL 211.7ff), as amended by 2005 PA 165.
(This bill was returned from the House with a House substitute (H-1), immediate effect and full title, and was laid over under the rules. See Senate Journal No. 116 of 2019, p. 1796.)
The question being on concurring in the substitute made to the bill by the House,
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 10
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2020-02-11
- Vote number
- 42
- Yeas
- 27
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Nays—10
Alexander Chang McMorrow Runestad
Barrett Irwin Polehanki Wojno
Bayer McBroom
Excused—1
Hollier
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: Nesbitt
Senator MacGregor moved to reconsider the vote by which the House substitute was concurred in.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
The question being on concurring in the substitute made to the bill by the House,
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 12
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2020-02-11
- Vote number
- 43
- Yeas
- 25