Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2020-02-11
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- unknown
- Yeas
- 25
- Nays
- 12
- Excused
- 1
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-12406
- Related sitting
- sitting-1484
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Nays—10 Alexander Chang McMorrow Runestad Barrett Irwin Polehanki Wojno Bayer McBroom Excused—1 Hollier Not Voting—0 In The Chair: Nesbitt Senator MacGregor moved to reconsider the vote by which the House substitute was concurred in. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on concurring in the substitute made to the bill by the House, The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Measure id
- measure-12406
- Motion text
- The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 12
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Sitting id
- sitting-1484
- Vote date
- 2020-02-11
- Vote id
- vote-11951
- Vote number
- 43
- Yeas
- 25
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-11951.
/api/v1/votes/vote-11951