Michigan Legislative Activity Ledger

Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 3 related records on this page. A total was not computed.

  1. Related record

    Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    Bruck Hall Paquette Thompson Carra Harris Posthumus VanderWall Cavitt Hoadley Prestin VanWoerkom DeBoer Johnsen Rigas Wendzel DeBoyer Kunse Roth Zorn In The Chair: Pohutsky The House agreed to the full title. The bill was referred to the Clerk for enrollment printing and presentation to the Governor. Third Reading of Bills House Bill No. 4343, entitled A bill to amend 2005 PA 244, entitled “Deferred presentment service transactions act,” by amending section 51 (MCL 487.2171). Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-3688
    Motion text
    Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Nays
    12
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    passed
    Sitting id
    sitting-418
    Vote date
    2023-06-22
    Vote id
    vote-2890
    Vote number
    207
    Yeas
    97
  2. Related record

    The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    senate
    Context text
    I’m really passionate about this issue but I don’t want to take up too much time with facts and figures; I want to elevate the stories of Michiganders. People like Samika Douglas of Grand Rapids who sought help from a predatory lending store for a minor car repair. Samika and her family assumed this would be a quick solution but became trapped in a cycle of debt that was nearly catastrophic. They could not afford to pay the initial loan and its associated fees, which resulted in the family having to repeatedly reborrow again and again and again. She and her husband and her two children almost lost their home in the process. We also heard from a single mother named Regina who needed a small-dollar loan to put food on the table for her children while she was pursuing her Ph.D. After taking out a $600 loan, Regina could not afford to pay it back immediately plus all the interest within 30 days, so she filed for an extension. Just a few short months later, what began as a $600 loan grew to over $1,400. Because of this, Regina experienced homelessness, wage garnishment, bankruptcy, and she was forced to end her Ph.D. program. Michiganders like Samika and Regina deserve better. The 36 percent interest rate written into this bill is based on a national model and is a huge compromise. In fact, if you talk to most of our constituents they would tell you, Wow, 36 percent is still really high, but compared to 370 percent, it’s a huge step in the right direction. Twenty other states, including the District of Columbia, have capped interest rates at 36 percent. As a nation we’ve also made the decision to solidify interest rates at 36 percent for active duty military and their family members, so why would the hardworking men and women back home in our communities not deserve the same level of consumer protection we afford for our military personnel? I know people still will have a need. There’s still going to be a need for short-term loans and as the Senate Appropriations Committee chairwoman I can tell you I am committed to making sure in this budget and budgets in the future, that we have resources available to help Michigan families. But today we can take a big step in the right direction. We have a chance to stand up for people who we serve which is what, quite honestly, we’re all here to do. I urge a “yes” vote. The following bill was read a third time: House Bill No. 4343, entitled A bill to amend 2005 PA 244, entitled “Deferred presentment service transactions act,” by amending section 51 (MCL 487.2171). The question being on the passage of the bill, Senator Cavanagh offered the following substitute: Substitute (S-2). The substitute was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Excused
    0
    Measure id
    measure-3688
    Motion text
    The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Nays
    0
    Not voting
    0
    Result
    passed
    Sitting id
    sitting-674
    Vote date
    2024-03-14
    Vote id
    vote-7577
    Vote number
    59
    Yeas
    38
  3. Related record

    The substitute (S-2) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    Reps. Snyder, McFall, Breen, Borton, Liberati, Farhat, Prestin, Markkanen, Brixie and Fitzgerald introduced House Bill No. 5722, entitled A bill to amend 1963 PA 181, entitled “Motor carrier safety act of 1963,” by amending section 2d (MCL 480.12d), as amended by 2011 PA 160. The bill was read a first time by its title and referred to the Committee on Regulatory Reform. By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of Messages from the Senate The Speaker laid before the House House Bill No. 4343, entitled A bill to amend 2005 PA 244, entitled “Deferred presentment service transactions act,” by amending section 51 (MCL 487.2171). (The bill was received from the Senate on March 14, with substitute (S-2) and full title inserted, consideration of which, under the rules, was postponed until March 19, see House Journal No. 25, p. 231.) The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-2) made to the bill by the Senate, The substitute (S-2) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-3688
    Motion text
    The substitute (S-2) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Nays
    11
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    unknown
    Sitting id
    sitting-498
    Vote date
    2024-05-09
    Vote id
    vote-3350
    Vote number
    81
    Yeas
    96