Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 3 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- of acts,”
The House agreed to the full title.
Rep. Aiyash moved that the bill be given immediate effect.
The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.
Rep. Aiyash moved that House Bill No. 5164 be placed on its immediate passage.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
House Bill No. 5164, entitled
A bill to create the call center jobs retention act; to provide for the powers and duties of certain state
governmental officers and entities; to impose certain duties on certain employers; and to prescribe civil
sanctions.
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays,
as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- as follows:
- Nays
- 52
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2024-11-13
- Vote number
- 349
- Yeas
- 57
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Albert offered the following amendments:
1. Amend page 2, line 5, after “(1)” by striking out “An” and inserting “Except as otherwise provided in
subsection (2), an”.
2. Amend page 2, following line 18, by inserting:
“(2) An employer that engages in an activity described in subsection (1)(a) or (b) is not required to
comply with subsection (1) if the employer is in compliance with the worker adjustment and retraining
notification act, 29 USC 2101 to 2109, for that activity.” and renumbering the remaining subsection.
The question being on the adoption of the amendments,
Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Motion text
- The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 19
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- failed
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 700
- Yeas
- 19
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Damoose Lauwers Runestad
Nays—19
Anthony Chang Klinefelt Polehanki
Bayer Cherry McCann Shink
Brinks Geiss McDonald Rivet Singh
Camilleri Hertel McMorrow Wojno
Cavanagh Irwin Moss
Excused—0
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: Geiss
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 18
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 701
- Yeas
- 20