Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 6 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- DeBoyer Maddock Schriver
In The Chair: Pohutsky
The House agreed to the title of the bill.
Rep. Aiyash moved that the bill be given immediate effect.
The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.
Rep. Aiyash moved that House Bill No. 5429 be placed on its immediate passage.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
House Bill No. 5429, entitled
A bill to create the court-appointed special advocate program; and to prescribe the duties and
responsibilities of the court-appointed special advocate program and volunteers.
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays,
as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- as follows:
- Nays
- 10
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2024-05-21
- Vote number
- 107
- Yeas
- 97
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- The Senate agreed to the full title.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 5429, entitled
A bill to create the court-appointed special advocate program; and to prescribe the duties and responsibilities of the court-appointed special advocate program and volunteers.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Runestad offered the following amendment:
1. Amend page 7, following line 8, by inserting:
“Sec. 13. A CASA volunteer must enter into a memorandum of understanding with the court in which the CASA volunteer agrees not to release to the public any information received under this act. A CASA volunteer who releases case-specific or identifying information under this act in a manner not allowed under this section is guilty of a misdemeanor.”.
The question being on the adoption of the amendment,
Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Motion text
- The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 20
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- failed
- Vote date
- 2024-06-26
- Vote number
- 298
- Yeas
- 18
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Damoose Lauwers
Nays—20
Anthony Chang Klinefelt Polehanki
Bayer Cherry McCann Santana
Brinks Geiss McDonald Rivet Shink
Camilleri Hertel McMorrow Singh
Cavanagh Irwin Moss Wojno
Excused—0
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: Moss
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 3
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2024-06-26
- Vote number
- 299
- Yeas
- 35
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- Edwards
Nays—1
Carra
In The Chair: Pohutsky
The House agreed to the title as amended.
The bill was referred to the Clerk for enrollment printing and presentation to the Governor.
The Speaker laid before the House
House Bill No. 5429, entitled
A bill to create the court-appointed special advocate program; and to prescribe the duties and responsibilities of the court-appointed special advocate program and volunteers.
(The bill was received from the Senate on June 26, with substitute (S-1) and immediate effect given by the Senate, consideration of which, under the rules, was postponed until today, see House Journal No. 58, p. 866.)
The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-1) made to the bill by the Senate,
The substitute (S-1) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- The substitute (S-1) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 11
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2024-06-27
- Vote number
- 285
- Yeas
- 99
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- Messages from the Senate
House Bill No. 5429, entitled
A bill to create the court-appointed special advocate program; and to prescribe the duties and
responsibilities of the court-appointed special advocate program and volunteers.
The Senate has substituted (S-2) the bill.
The Senate has passed the bill as substituted (S-2).
The Speaker announced that pursuant to Rule 42, the bill was laid over one day.
Rep. Aiyash moved that Rule 42 be suspended.
The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-2) made to the bill by the Senate,
The substitute (S-2) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays,
as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- as follows:
- Nays
- 13
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2024-09-25
- Vote number
- 325
- Yeas
- 96
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Chang offered the following substitute:
Substitute (S-2).
The question being on the adoption of the substitute,
Senator Runestad offered the following amendment to the substitute:
1. Amend page 7, following line 8, by inserting:
“Sec. 13. A CASA volunteer must enter into a memorandum of understanding with the court in which the CASA volunteer agrees not to release to the public any information received under this act. A CASA volunteer who releases case-specific or identifying information under this act in a manner not allowed under this section is guilty of a misdemeanor.”.
The amendment to the substitute was not adopted.
The question being on the adoption of the substitute,
The substitute was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 3
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2024-09-25
- Vote number
- 350
- Yeas
- 35