Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2022-05-03
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- failed
- Yeas
- 13
- Nays
- 22
- Excused
- 3
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-10245
- Related sitting
- sitting-1092
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- ( iii ) A statement from the unit of local government on how the grant program has made the police department of that unit of local government more diverse in terms of qualified demographic groups. (5) Each year, the director shall submit a report to the governor and each house of the legislature and publish a copy of the report on its internet website. The report must contain all of the following: (a) The name of the unit of local government that received a grant under this act. (b) The number of police recruits trained by each unit of local government that received a grant under this act. (c) The number of individuals who are members of a qualified demographic group employed by the units of local government that received a grant under this act. (d) The number of applicants who applied to the unit of local government for funds under this section. (6) As used in this section: (a) “Qualified demographic group” means women, minorities, and historically underrepresented groups within or near the unit of local government as determined by the department. (b) “Unit of local government” means a city, village, or township.” Senator Stamas requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 3
- Measure id
- measure-10245
- Motion text
- The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 22
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- failed
- Sitting id
- sitting-1092
- Vote date
- 2022-05-03
- Vote id
- vote-10067
- Vote number
- 156
- Yeas
- 13
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-10067.
/api/v1/votes/vote-10067