Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The substitute was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The substitute was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2022-05-19
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- failed
- Yeas
- 14
- Nays
- 22
- Excused
- 2
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-7407
- Related sitting
- sitting-1100
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- House Bill No. 4568 Senate Bill No. 784 The motion prevailed. The following bill was read a third time: House Bill No. 4568, entitled A bill to amend 1967 PA 281, entitled “Income tax act of 1967,” (MCL 206.1 to 206.713) by adding sections 301a and 681a. The question being on the passage of the bill, Senator Hertel offered the following substitute: Substitute (S-2). Senator Chang requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The substitute was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 2
- Measure id
- measure-7407
- Motion text
- The substitute was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 22
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- failed
- Sitting id
- sitting-1100
- Vote date
- 2022-05-19
- Vote id
- vote-10179
- Vote number
- 268
- Yeas
- 14
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The substitute was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-10179.
/api/v1/votes/vote-10179