Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2022-09-28
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- passed
- Yeas
- 32
- Nays
- 4
- Excused
- 2
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-9654
- Related sitting
- sitting-1124
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Alexander Chang Hollier Irwin Bayer Excused—2 Geiss McMorrow Not Voting—0 In The Chair: Nesbitt The question being on concurring in the committee recommendation to give the bill immediate effect, The recommendation was concurred in, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor. Senator Lauwers moved to reconsider the vote by which the bill was passed. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 2
- Measure id
- measure-9654
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 4
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Sitting id
- sitting-1124
- Vote date
- 2022-09-28
- Vote id
- vote-10348
- Vote number
- 437
- Yeas
- 32
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-10348.
/api/v1/votes/vote-10348