Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2020-01-08
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- unknown
- Yeas
- 27
- Nays
- 10
- Excused
- 1
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-12274
- Related sitting
- sitting-1470
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Not Voting—0 In The Chair: Nesbitt The question being on concurring in the committee recommendation to give the bill immediate effect, The recommendation was concurred in, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor. The Senate agreed to the title as amended. The bill was referred to the Secretary for enrollment printing and presentation to the Governor. Senator Santana entered the Senate Chamber. Senate Bill No. 323, entitled A bill to amend 1909 PA 283, entitled “An act to revise, consolidate, and add to the laws relating to the establishment, opening, discontinuing, vacating, closing, altering, improvement, maintenance, and use of the public highways and private roads; the condemnation of property and gravel therefor; the building, repairing and preservation of bridges; maintaining public access to waterways under certain conditions; setting and protecting shade trees, drainage, and cutting weeds and brush within this state; providing for the election or appointment and defining the powers, duties, and compensation of state, county, township, and district highway officials; and to prescribe penalties and provide remedies,” by amending section 6 of chapter IV (MCL 224.6), as amended by 2015 PA 237. (This bill was returned from the House on December 19, 2019, with a House substitute (H-5) and immediate effect, and was laid over under the rules. See Senate Journal No. 116 of 2019, p. 1795.) The question being on concurring in the substitute made to the bill by the House, The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Measure id
- measure-12274
- Motion text
- The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 10
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Sitting id
- sitting-1470
- Vote date
- 2020-01-08
- Vote id
- vote-11910
- Vote number
- 2
- Yeas
- 27
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-11910.
/api/v1/votes/vote-11910