Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2020-04-24
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- adopted
- Yeas
- 22
- Nays
- 15
- Excused
- 1
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-14048
- Related sitting
- sitting-1502
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Bumstead Lucido Runestad VanderWall Daley MacDonald Schmidt Victory Horn MacGregor Shirkey Zorn Johnson McBroom Excused—1 Alexander Not Voting—0 In The Chair: President The question being on the adoption of the concurrent resolution, Senator Chang requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Measure id
- measure-14048
- Motion text
- The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 15
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- adopted
- Sitting id
- sitting-1502
- Vote date
- 2020-04-24
- Vote id
- vote-12042
- Vote number
- 134
- Yeas
- 22
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-12042.
/api/v1/votes/vote-12042