Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The concurrent resolution as amended was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The concurrent resolution as amended was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2020-09-24
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- adopted
- Yeas
- 22
- Nays
- 14
- Excused
- 1
- Not voting
- 1
- Related measure
- measure-12068
- Related sitting
- sitting-1542
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Chang Lucido Polehanki Wojno Daley MacDonald Runestad Zorn Geiss Nays—0 Excused—1 Ananich Not Voting—0 In The Chair: Nesbitt The question being on the adoption of the concurrent resolution, Senator MacGregor requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The concurrent resolution as amended was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Measure id
- measure-12068
- Motion text
- The concurrent resolution as amended was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 14
- Not voting
- 1
- Result
- adopted
- Sitting id
- sitting-1542
- Vote date
- 2020-09-24
- Vote id
- vote-12260
- Vote number
- 352
- Yeas
- 22
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The concurrent resolution as amended was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-12260.
/api/v1/votes/vote-12260