Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2020-12-18
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- unknown
- Yeas
- 34
- Nays
- 3
- Excused
- 1
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-14287
- Related sitting
- sitting-1566
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Geiss Nays—3 Barrett Bumstead Runestad Excused—1 Lucido Not Voting—1 McBroom In The Chair: President Senator MacGregor moved to reconsider the vote by which the House substitute was concurred in. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on concurring in the substitute made to the bill by the House, The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Measure id
- measure-14287
- Motion text
- The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 3
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Sitting id
- sitting-1566
- Vote date
- 2020-12-18
- Vote id
- vote-12523
- Vote number
- 615
- Yeas
- 34
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-12523.
/api/v1/votes/vote-12523